Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders

Background: Regional medical campuses (RMC) have shown promise in addressing physician shortages. RMCs have been positively evaluated in rural/remote communities, however, it is unclear whether this model will be as beneficial in underserved urban areas. This study evaluated the impact of a RMC on...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerry Cooper, Maher El-Masri, Kyle DeMars, Nathan Tam, Nicole Sbrocca, Mark Awuku, Lawrence Jacobs
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98aaffd889894cf79fa33d3f334de7f6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:98aaffd889894cf79fa33d3f334de7f6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:98aaffd889894cf79fa33d3f334de7f62021-12-01T22:38:27ZImpact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders10.36834/cmej.699511923-1202https://doaj.org/article/98aaffd889894cf79fa33d3f334de7f62020-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/69951https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202 Background: Regional medical campuses (RMC) have shown promise in addressing physician shortages. RMCs have been positively evaluated in rural/remote communities, however, it is unclear whether this model will be as beneficial in underserved urban areas. This study evaluated the impact of a RMC on a midsized urban city (Windsor, Ontario). We compare our results with a similar study conducted in a remote community in British Columbia (BC). Methods: A broad array of community stakeholders representing different sectors were consulted using a semi-structured interview format replicated from the BC Northern Medical Program (NMP) study. Thematic analysis based on the resulting rich data was conducted within a grounded theory context. Results: Twenty-three participants (52% male) representing healthcare, education, business, community and government/politico sectors were consulted. Their views regarding the Windsor Regional Medical Campus (WRMC) aligned around several themes: improved healthcare, enhanced community reputation, stimulated economic/community development, expanded training opportunities and an engaged community regarding the WRMC. These results were compared to the main findings of the NMP study with both similarities (e.g. increased community pride) and differences (e.g. resource concerns) discussed. Conclusion: Community stakeholders provided strong support for the WRMC through their perceptions of its positive impact on this urban region. These findings are consistent with similar RMC studies in rural/remote areas. Those interested in developing a RMC might benefit from considering these findings. Gerry CooperMaher El-MasriKyle DeMarsNathan TamNicole SbroccaMark AwukuLawrence JacobsCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 12, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Gerry Cooper
Maher El-Masri
Kyle DeMars
Nathan Tam
Nicole Sbrocca
Mark Awuku
Lawrence Jacobs
Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
description Background: Regional medical campuses (RMC) have shown promise in addressing physician shortages. RMCs have been positively evaluated in rural/remote communities, however, it is unclear whether this model will be as beneficial in underserved urban areas. This study evaluated the impact of a RMC on a midsized urban city (Windsor, Ontario). We compare our results with a similar study conducted in a remote community in British Columbia (BC). Methods: A broad array of community stakeholders representing different sectors were consulted using a semi-structured interview format replicated from the BC Northern Medical Program (NMP) study. Thematic analysis based on the resulting rich data was conducted within a grounded theory context. Results: Twenty-three participants (52% male) representing healthcare, education, business, community and government/politico sectors were consulted. Their views regarding the Windsor Regional Medical Campus (WRMC) aligned around several themes: improved healthcare, enhanced community reputation, stimulated economic/community development, expanded training opportunities and an engaged community regarding the WRMC. These results were compared to the main findings of the NMP study with both similarities (e.g. increased community pride) and differences (e.g. resource concerns) discussed. Conclusion: Community stakeholders provided strong support for the WRMC through their perceptions of its positive impact on this urban region. These findings are consistent with similar RMC studies in rural/remote areas. Those interested in developing a RMC might benefit from considering these findings.
format article
author Gerry Cooper
Maher El-Masri
Kyle DeMars
Nathan Tam
Nicole Sbrocca
Mark Awuku
Lawrence Jacobs
author_facet Gerry Cooper
Maher El-Masri
Kyle DeMars
Nathan Tam
Nicole Sbrocca
Mark Awuku
Lawrence Jacobs
author_sort Gerry Cooper
title Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
title_short Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
title_full Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
title_fullStr Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
title_sort impact of an urban regional medical campus: perceptions of community stakeholders
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/98aaffd889894cf79fa33d3f334de7f6
work_keys_str_mv AT gerrycooper impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT maherelmasri impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT kyledemars impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT nathantam impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT nicolesbrocca impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT markawuku impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
AT lawrencejacobs impactofanurbanregionalmedicalcampusperceptionsofcommunitystakeholders
_version_ 1718404116502282240