Machine learning based predictors for COVID-19 disease severity

Abstract Predictors of the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation can help healthcare systems in planning for surge capacity for COVID-19. We used socio-demographic data, clinical data, and blood panel profile data at the time of initial presentation to develop machine learning algorithm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhruv Patel, Vikram Kher, Bhushan Desai, Xiaomeng Lei, Steven Cen, Neha Nanda, Ali Gholamrezanezhad, Vinay Duddalwar, Bino Varghese, Assad A Oberai
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/98e212396cce4319a5ca65c1b2b5d377
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract Predictors of the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation can help healthcare systems in planning for surge capacity for COVID-19. We used socio-demographic data, clinical data, and blood panel profile data at the time of initial presentation to develop machine learning algorithms for predicting the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Among the algorithms considered, the Random Forest classifier performed the best with $$\text {AUC} = 0.80$$ AUC = 0.80 for predicting ICU need and $$\text {AUC} = 0.82$$ AUC = 0.82 for predicting the need for mechanical ventilation. We also determined the most influential features in making this prediction, and concluded that all three categories of data are important. We determined the relative importance of blood panel profile data and noted that the AUC dropped by 0.12 units when this data was not included, thus indicating that it provided valuable information in predicting disease severity. Finally, we generated RF predictors with a reduced set of five features that retained the performance of the predictors trained on all features. These predictors, which rely only on quantitative data, are less prone to errors and subjectivity.