Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences
Abstract Incentives can be used to increase motivation, leading to better learning and performance on skilled motor tasks. Prior work has shown that monetary punishments enhance on-line performance while equivalent monetary rewards enhance off-line skill retention. However, a large body of literatur...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/98e3c08dae9b437eac14a3c3a7f2c5c9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:98e3c08dae9b437eac14a3c3a7f2c5c9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:98e3c08dae9b437eac14a3c3a7f2c5c92021-12-02T17:14:58ZInteractive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences10.1038/s41598-021-88286-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/98e3c08dae9b437eac14a3c3a7f2c5c92021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88286-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Incentives can be used to increase motivation, leading to better learning and performance on skilled motor tasks. Prior work has shown that monetary punishments enhance on-line performance while equivalent monetary rewards enhance off-line skill retention. However, a large body of literature on loss aversion has shown that losses are treated as larger than equivalent gains. The divergence between the effects of punishments and reward on motor learning could be due to perceived differences in incentive value rather than valence per se. We test this hypothesis by manipulating incentive value and valence while participants trained to perform motor sequences. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that large reward enhanced on-line performance but impaired the ability to retain the level of performance achieved during training. However, we also found that on-line performance was better with reward than punishment and that the effect of increasing incentive value was more linear with reward (small, medium, large) while the effect of value was more binary with punishment (large vs not large). These results suggest that there are differential effects of punishment and reward on motor learning and that these effects of valence are unlikely to be driven by differences in the subjective magnitude of gains and losses.Tyler J. AdkinsBradley S. GaryTaraz G. LeeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Tyler J. Adkins Bradley S. Gary Taraz G. Lee Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
description |
Abstract Incentives can be used to increase motivation, leading to better learning and performance on skilled motor tasks. Prior work has shown that monetary punishments enhance on-line performance while equivalent monetary rewards enhance off-line skill retention. However, a large body of literature on loss aversion has shown that losses are treated as larger than equivalent gains. The divergence between the effects of punishments and reward on motor learning could be due to perceived differences in incentive value rather than valence per se. We test this hypothesis by manipulating incentive value and valence while participants trained to perform motor sequences. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that large reward enhanced on-line performance but impaired the ability to retain the level of performance achieved during training. However, we also found that on-line performance was better with reward than punishment and that the effect of increasing incentive value was more linear with reward (small, medium, large) while the effect of value was more binary with punishment (large vs not large). These results suggest that there are differential effects of punishment and reward on motor learning and that these effects of valence are unlikely to be driven by differences in the subjective magnitude of gains and losses. |
format |
article |
author |
Tyler J. Adkins Bradley S. Gary Taraz G. Lee |
author_facet |
Tyler J. Adkins Bradley S. Gary Taraz G. Lee |
author_sort |
Tyler J. Adkins |
title |
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
title_short |
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
title_full |
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
title_fullStr |
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
title_sort |
interactive effects of incentive value and valence on the performance of discrete action sequences |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/98e3c08dae9b437eac14a3c3a7f2c5c9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tylerjadkins interactiveeffectsofincentivevalueandvalenceontheperformanceofdiscreteactionsequences AT bradleysgary interactiveeffectsofincentivevalueandvalenceontheperformanceofdiscreteactionsequences AT tarazglee interactiveeffectsofincentivevalueandvalenceontheperformanceofdiscreteactionsequences |
_version_ |
1718381274779877376 |