Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity

Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a q...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shelby Kimmel, Cedric Yen-Yu Lin, Guang Hao Low, Maris Ozols, Theodore J. Yoder
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba664852021-12-02T12:33:37ZHamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity10.1038/s41534-017-0013-72056-6387https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba664852017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0013-7https://doaj.org/toc/2056-6387Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a quantum program to be run on any other state. They use this approach to do principal component analysis of the software state. Here, we expand on their results, providing protocols for running more-complex quantum programs specified by several different states. Our protocols can be used to analyze the relationship between different states (for example, deciding whether states are orthogonal) and to create new states (such as coherent linear combinations of two states). We also outline the optimality of Lloyd et al.’s original protocol, as well as our new protocols.Shelby KimmelCedric Yen-Yu LinGuang Hao LowMaris OzolsTheodore J. YoderNature PortfolioarticlePhysicsQC1-999Electronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95ENnpj Quantum Information, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Physics
QC1-999
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Shelby Kimmel
Cedric Yen-Yu Lin
Guang Hao Low
Maris Ozols
Theodore J. Yoder
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
description Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a quantum program to be run on any other state. They use this approach to do principal component analysis of the software state. Here, we expand on their results, providing protocols for running more-complex quantum programs specified by several different states. Our protocols can be used to analyze the relationship between different states (for example, deciding whether states are orthogonal) and to create new states (such as coherent linear combinations of two states). We also outline the optimality of Lloyd et al.’s original protocol, as well as our new protocols.
format article
author Shelby Kimmel
Cedric Yen-Yu Lin
Guang Hao Low
Maris Ozols
Theodore J. Yoder
author_facet Shelby Kimmel
Cedric Yen-Yu Lin
Guang Hao Low
Maris Ozols
Theodore J. Yoder
author_sort Shelby Kimmel
title Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
title_short Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
title_full Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
title_fullStr Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
title_full_unstemmed Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
title_sort hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485
work_keys_str_mv AT shelbykimmel hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity
AT cedricyenyulin hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity
AT guanghaolow hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity
AT marisozols hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity
AT theodorejyoder hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity
_version_ 1718393874810929152