Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity
Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a q...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba664852021-12-02T12:33:37ZHamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity10.1038/s41534-017-0013-72056-6387https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba664852017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0013-7https://doaj.org/toc/2056-6387Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a quantum program to be run on any other state. They use this approach to do principal component analysis of the software state. Here, we expand on their results, providing protocols for running more-complex quantum programs specified by several different states. Our protocols can be used to analyze the relationship between different states (for example, deciding whether states are orthogonal) and to create new states (such as coherent linear combinations of two states). We also outline the optimality of Lloyd et al.’s original protocol, as well as our new protocols.Shelby KimmelCedric Yen-Yu LinGuang Hao LowMaris OzolsTheodore J. YoderNature PortfolioarticlePhysicsQC1-999Electronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95ENnpj Quantum Information, Vol 3, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Physics QC1-999 Electronic computers. Computer science QA75.5-76.95 |
spellingShingle |
Physics QC1-999 Electronic computers. Computer science QA75.5-76.95 Shelby Kimmel Cedric Yen-Yu Lin Guang Hao Low Maris Ozols Theodore J. Yoder Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
description |
Quantum Software from Quantum States One of the hallmarks of quantum computation is the storage and extraction of information within quantum systems. Recently, Lloyd, Mohseni and Rebentrost created a protocol to treat multiple identical copies of a quantum state as “quantum software”, specifying a quantum program to be run on any other state. They use this approach to do principal component analysis of the software state. Here, we expand on their results, providing protocols for running more-complex quantum programs specified by several different states. Our protocols can be used to analyze the relationship between different states (for example, deciding whether states are orthogonal) and to create new states (such as coherent linear combinations of two states). We also outline the optimality of Lloyd et al.’s original protocol, as well as our new protocols. |
format |
article |
author |
Shelby Kimmel Cedric Yen-Yu Lin Guang Hao Low Maris Ozols Theodore J. Yoder |
author_facet |
Shelby Kimmel Cedric Yen-Yu Lin Guang Hao Low Maris Ozols Theodore J. Yoder |
author_sort |
Shelby Kimmel |
title |
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
title_short |
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
title_full |
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
title_fullStr |
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
title_sort |
hamiltonian simulation with optimal sample complexity |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/991483e91eb14e1bb598a6138ba66485 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shelbykimmel hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity AT cedricyenyulin hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity AT guanghaolow hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity AT marisozols hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity AT theodorejyoder hamiltoniansimulationwithoptimalsamplecomplexity |
_version_ |
1718393874810929152 |