Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation

The nutrient adequacy of a diet is typically assessed by comparing estimated nutrient intakes with established average nutrient requirements; this approach does not consider total energy consumed. In this multinational survey investigation in Indonesia, Mexico, and South Africa, we explore the appli...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marieke Vossenaar, Noel W. Solomons, Siti Muslimatun, Mieke Faber, Olga P. García, Eva Monterrosa, Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen, Klaus Kraemer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/991722bafe2649a3aa9b76c86914b4b1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:991722bafe2649a3aa9b76c86914b4b1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:991722bafe2649a3aa9b76c86914b4b12021-11-25T18:36:06ZNutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation10.3390/nu131140162072-6643https://doaj.org/article/991722bafe2649a3aa9b76c86914b4b12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/4016https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6643The nutrient adequacy of a diet is typically assessed by comparing estimated nutrient intakes with established average nutrient requirements; this approach does not consider total energy consumed. In this multinational survey investigation in Indonesia, Mexico, and South Africa, we explore the applications of the “critical nutrient-density approach”—which brings energy requirements into the equation—in the context of public health epidemiology. We conducted 24 h dietary recalls in convenience samples of normal-weight (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) or obese (BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), low-income women in three settings (<i>n</i> = 290). Dietary adequacy was assessed both in absolute terms and using the nutrient density approach. No significant differences in energy and nutrient intakes were observed between normal-weight and obese women within any of the three samples (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both the cut-point method (% of EAR) and critical nutrient density approach revealed a high probability of inadequate intakes for several micronutrients but with poor concordance between the two methods. We conclude that it may often require some approximate estimate of the habitual energy intake from an empirical source to apply a true critical nutrient density reference for a population or subgroup. This will logically signify that there would be more “problem nutrients” in the diets examined with this nutrient density approach, and efforts toward improved food selection or food- or biofortification will frequently be indicated.Marieke VossenaarNoel W. SolomonsSiti MuslimatunMieke FaberOlga P. GarcíaEva MonterrosaKesso Gabrielle van ZutphenKlaus KraemerMDPI AGarticlemicronutrientsnutritious dietsnutrient densityenergy expenditureproblem nutrientswomenNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENNutrients, Vol 13, Iss 4016, p 4016 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic micronutrients
nutritious diets
nutrient density
energy expenditure
problem nutrients
women
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
spellingShingle micronutrients
nutritious diets
nutrient density
energy expenditure
problem nutrients
women
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Marieke Vossenaar
Noel W. Solomons
Siti Muslimatun
Mieke Faber
Olga P. García
Eva Monterrosa
Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen
Klaus Kraemer
Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
description The nutrient adequacy of a diet is typically assessed by comparing estimated nutrient intakes with established average nutrient requirements; this approach does not consider total energy consumed. In this multinational survey investigation in Indonesia, Mexico, and South Africa, we explore the applications of the “critical nutrient-density approach”—which brings energy requirements into the equation—in the context of public health epidemiology. We conducted 24 h dietary recalls in convenience samples of normal-weight (BMI 18.5–25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) or obese (BMI > 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), low-income women in three settings (<i>n</i> = 290). Dietary adequacy was assessed both in absolute terms and using the nutrient density approach. No significant differences in energy and nutrient intakes were observed between normal-weight and obese women within any of the three samples (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both the cut-point method (% of EAR) and critical nutrient density approach revealed a high probability of inadequate intakes for several micronutrients but with poor concordance between the two methods. We conclude that it may often require some approximate estimate of the habitual energy intake from an empirical source to apply a true critical nutrient density reference for a population or subgroup. This will logically signify that there would be more “problem nutrients” in the diets examined with this nutrient density approach, and efforts toward improved food selection or food- or biofortification will frequently be indicated.
format article
author Marieke Vossenaar
Noel W. Solomons
Siti Muslimatun
Mieke Faber
Olga P. García
Eva Monterrosa
Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen
Klaus Kraemer
author_facet Marieke Vossenaar
Noel W. Solomons
Siti Muslimatun
Mieke Faber
Olga P. García
Eva Monterrosa
Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen
Klaus Kraemer
author_sort Marieke Vossenaar
title Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
title_short Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
title_full Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
title_fullStr Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Nutrient Density as a Dimension of Dietary Quality: Findings of the Nutrient Density Approach in a Multi-Center Evaluation
title_sort nutrient density as a dimension of dietary quality: findings of the nutrient density approach in a multi-center evaluation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/991722bafe2649a3aa9b76c86914b4b1
work_keys_str_mv AT mariekevossenaar nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT noelwsolomons nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT sitimuslimatun nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT miekefaber nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT olgapgarcia nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT evamonterrosa nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT kessogabriellevanzutphen nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
AT klauskraemer nutrientdensityasadimensionofdietaryqualityfindingsofthenutrientdensityapproachinamulticenterevaluation
_version_ 1718410905782321152