Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage
Abstract Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) improves vision in patients with chronic visual impairments and an acute treatment increased survival of retinal neurons after optic nerve crush (ONC) in rodent models of visual system injury. However, despite this protection n...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/99340675faf845f2b6ab9a12b0e4221a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:99340675faf845f2b6ab9a12b0e4221a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:99340675faf845f2b6ab9a12b0e4221a2021-12-02T12:30:17ZElectrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage10.1038/s41598-017-00487-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/99340675faf845f2b6ab9a12b0e4221a2017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00487-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) improves vision in patients with chronic visual impairments and an acute treatment increased survival of retinal neurons after optic nerve crush (ONC) in rodent models of visual system injury. However, despite this protection no functional recovery could be detected in rats, which was interpreted as evidence of “silent survivor” cells. We now analysed the mechanisms underlying this “silent survival” effect. Using in vivo microscopy of the retina we investigated the survival and morphology of fluorescent neurons before and after ONC in animals receiving rtACS or sham treatment. One week after the crush, more neurons survived in the rtACS-treated group compared to sham-treated controls. In vivo imaging further revealed that in the initial post-ONC period, rtACS induced dendritic pruning in surviving neurons. In contrast, dendrites in untreated retinae degenerated slowly after the axonal trauma and neurons died. The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that cell signalling is abolished in the surviving neurons. Despite this evidence of “silencing”, intracellular free calcium imaging showed that the cells were still viable. We propose that early after trauma, complete dendritic stripping following rtACS protects neurons from excitotoxic cell death by silencing them.Petra Henrich-NoackElena G. SergeevaTorben EberQing YouNadine VoigtJürgen KöhlerSebastian WagnerStefanie LazikChristian MawrinGuihua XuSayantan BiswasBernhard A. SabelChristopher Kai-Shun LeungNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Petra Henrich-Noack Elena G. Sergeeva Torben Eber Qing You Nadine Voigt Jürgen Köhler Sebastian Wagner Stefanie Lazik Christian Mawrin Guihua Xu Sayantan Biswas Bernhard A. Sabel Christopher Kai-Shun Leung Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
description |
Abstract Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) improves vision in patients with chronic visual impairments and an acute treatment increased survival of retinal neurons after optic nerve crush (ONC) in rodent models of visual system injury. However, despite this protection no functional recovery could be detected in rats, which was interpreted as evidence of “silent survivor” cells. We now analysed the mechanisms underlying this “silent survival” effect. Using in vivo microscopy of the retina we investigated the survival and morphology of fluorescent neurons before and after ONC in animals receiving rtACS or sham treatment. One week after the crush, more neurons survived in the rtACS-treated group compared to sham-treated controls. In vivo imaging further revealed that in the initial post-ONC period, rtACS induced dendritic pruning in surviving neurons. In contrast, dendrites in untreated retinae degenerated slowly after the axonal trauma and neurons died. The complete loss of visual evoked potentials supports the hypothesis that cell signalling is abolished in the surviving neurons. Despite this evidence of “silencing”, intracellular free calcium imaging showed that the cells were still viable. We propose that early after trauma, complete dendritic stripping following rtACS protects neurons from excitotoxic cell death by silencing them. |
format |
article |
author |
Petra Henrich-Noack Elena G. Sergeeva Torben Eber Qing You Nadine Voigt Jürgen Köhler Sebastian Wagner Stefanie Lazik Christian Mawrin Guihua Xu Sayantan Biswas Bernhard A. Sabel Christopher Kai-Shun Leung |
author_facet |
Petra Henrich-Noack Elena G. Sergeeva Torben Eber Qing You Nadine Voigt Jürgen Köhler Sebastian Wagner Stefanie Lazik Christian Mawrin Guihua Xu Sayantan Biswas Bernhard A. Sabel Christopher Kai-Shun Leung |
author_sort |
Petra Henrich-Noack |
title |
Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
title_short |
Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
title_full |
Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
title_fullStr |
Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
title_sort |
electrical brain stimulation induces dendritic stripping but improves survival of silent neurons after optic nerve damage |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/99340675faf845f2b6ab9a12b0e4221a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petrahenrichnoack electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT elenagsergeeva electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT torbeneber electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT qingyou electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT nadinevoigt electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT jurgenkohler electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT sebastianwagner electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT stefanielazik electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT christianmawrin electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT guihuaxu electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT sayantanbiswas electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT bernhardasabel electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage AT christopherkaishunleung electricalbrainstimulationinducesdendriticstrippingbutimprovessurvivalofsilentneuronsafteropticnervedamage |
_version_ |
1718394411180621824 |