Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes

Drought is a major threat to food security worldwide, and drought-tolerant plants are a convenient model to study the mechanisms underlying drought tolerance. Some of the studies on drought tolerance mechanisms have been performed under controlled environments, while others have been undertaken unde...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goitseone Malambane, Utlwang Batlang, Kelebonye Ramolekwa, Hisashi Tsujimoto, Kinya Akashi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/994f32f62e014cdeaebdc53f7f56f762
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:994f32f62e014cdeaebdc53f7f56f762
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:994f32f62e014cdeaebdc53f7f56f7622021-12-04T04:36:32ZGrowth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes2667-064X10.1016/j.stress.2021.100017https://doaj.org/article/994f32f62e014cdeaebdc53f7f56f7622021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667064X21000166https://doaj.org/toc/2667-064XDrought is a major threat to food security worldwide, and drought-tolerant plants are a convenient model to study the mechanisms underlying drought tolerance. Some of the studies on drought tolerance mechanisms have been performed under controlled environments, while others have been undertaken under natural field conditions; nevertheless, it is important to evaluate the similarities and differences between the results obtained in each case. In this study, the physiological responses of a drought-tolerant wildtype and a drought-susceptible watermelon cultivar were evaluated under both natural and artificial environments. Although different in intensity, the trend of physiological responses was similar in both environments. After five days of exposure to drought, the wildtype showed a sharper decline (80.91%) in CO2 assimilation in the field than in a growth chamber (65.81%). The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) parameters showed lower values in the cultivar than in the wildtype, regardless of growth environment; additionally, final NPQ values recorded for the wildtype were significantly higher in field plants than in those grown in a growth chamber. Regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation between NPQ and photosynthesis in the wildtype in both environments, while the relationships were non-significant in field-cultivated watermelon. These findings demonstrate that artificial conditions can be used to study the trends of plant responses to environmental stress, but results must be interpreted with caution.Goitseone MalambaneUtlwang BatlangKelebonye RamolekwaHisashi TsujimotoKinya AkashiElsevierarticleWildtype watermelonControlled environmentDrought stressCO2 assimilationChlorophyll fluorescenceNatural environmentPlant ecologyQK900-989ENPlant Stress, Vol 2, Iss , Pp 100017- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Wildtype watermelon
Controlled environment
Drought stress
CO2 assimilation
Chlorophyll fluorescence
Natural environment
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle Wildtype watermelon
Controlled environment
Drought stress
CO2 assimilation
Chlorophyll fluorescence
Natural environment
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Goitseone Malambane
Utlwang Batlang
Kelebonye Ramolekwa
Hisashi Tsujimoto
Kinya Akashi
Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
description Drought is a major threat to food security worldwide, and drought-tolerant plants are a convenient model to study the mechanisms underlying drought tolerance. Some of the studies on drought tolerance mechanisms have been performed under controlled environments, while others have been undertaken under natural field conditions; nevertheless, it is important to evaluate the similarities and differences between the results obtained in each case. In this study, the physiological responses of a drought-tolerant wildtype and a drought-susceptible watermelon cultivar were evaluated under both natural and artificial environments. Although different in intensity, the trend of physiological responses was similar in both environments. After five days of exposure to drought, the wildtype showed a sharper decline (80.91%) in CO2 assimilation in the field than in a growth chamber (65.81%). The non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) parameters showed lower values in the cultivar than in the wildtype, regardless of growth environment; additionally, final NPQ values recorded for the wildtype were significantly higher in field plants than in those grown in a growth chamber. Regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation between NPQ and photosynthesis in the wildtype in both environments, while the relationships were non-significant in field-cultivated watermelon. These findings demonstrate that artificial conditions can be used to study the trends of plant responses to environmental stress, but results must be interpreted with caution.
format article
author Goitseone Malambane
Utlwang Batlang
Kelebonye Ramolekwa
Hisashi Tsujimoto
Kinya Akashi
author_facet Goitseone Malambane
Utlwang Batlang
Kelebonye Ramolekwa
Hisashi Tsujimoto
Kinya Akashi
author_sort Goitseone Malambane
title Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
title_short Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
title_full Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
title_fullStr Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
title_sort growth chamber and field evaluation of physiological factors of two watermelon genotypes
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/994f32f62e014cdeaebdc53f7f56f762
work_keys_str_mv AT goitseonemalambane growthchamberandfieldevaluationofphysiologicalfactorsoftwowatermelongenotypes
AT utlwangbatlang growthchamberandfieldevaluationofphysiologicalfactorsoftwowatermelongenotypes
AT kelebonyeramolekwa growthchamberandfieldevaluationofphysiologicalfactorsoftwowatermelongenotypes
AT hisashitsujimoto growthchamberandfieldevaluationofphysiologicalfactorsoftwowatermelongenotypes
AT kinyaakashi growthchamberandfieldevaluationofphysiologicalfactorsoftwowatermelongenotypes
_version_ 1718372929129938944