Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

Background: Midfacial hypoplasia is a common feature in patients with combined cleft lip and palate. The current study was done to assess the effect of facemask (FM) therapy in patients with unilateral cleft palate. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Saurav Kumar, Gaurav Verma, Nadira Hassan, Ravi Anjan, Rehan Ahmad Khan, Sana Shaikh
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	cleft palate facemask mid-facial Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9972bd499c42406ba0c5156acb434d4e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9972bd499c42406ba0c5156acb434d4e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9972bd499c42406ba0c5156acb434d4e2021-11-19T12:15:52ZFacemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_133_21https://doaj.org/article/9972bd499c42406ba0c5156acb434d4e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1303;epage=1305;aulast=Kumarhttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Midfacial hypoplasia is a common feature in patients with combined cleft lip and palate. The current study was done to assess the effect of facemask (FM) therapy in patients with unilateral cleft palate. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate were treated with maxillary transversal discrepancy with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) followed by FM therapy. After the completion of the RME treatment, the same appliance was used for protraction. Radiographs were taken after removing the RME appliance (T1) and at the end of the FM treatment after removing the appliance (T2). Results: There were 5 males and 11 females. SNA was 73.1° and 79.4°, SNB was 75.2° and 72.4°, ANB was −3.21° and 2.90°, SN-PP was 11.2° and 10.4°, Co-A was 84.3 mm and 87.5 mm, A-HR was 55.2 mm and 57.8 mm, A-VR was 62.4 mm and 64.7 mm, and SN-MP was 38.2 mm and 41.5 mm before and after treatment, respectively. Conclusion: FM proved to be beneficial in causing significant improvement in patients having combined cleft lip and palate.Saurav KumarGaurav VermaNadira HassanRavi AnjanRehan Ahmad KhanSana ShaikhWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlecleft palatefacemaskmid-facialPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1303-1305 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	cleft palate facemask mid-facial Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	cleft palate facemask mid-facial Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Ravi Anjan Rehan Ahmad Khan Sana Shaikh Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
description	Background: Midfacial hypoplasia is a common feature in patients with combined cleft lip and palate. The current study was done to assess the effect of facemask (FM) therapy in patients with unilateral cleft palate. Materials and Methods: A total of 16 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate were treated with maxillary transversal discrepancy with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) followed by FM therapy. After the completion of the RME treatment, the same appliance was used for protraction. Radiographs were taken after removing the RME appliance (T1) and at the end of the FM treatment after removing the appliance (T2). Results: There were 5 males and 11 females. SNA was 73.1° and 79.4°, SNB was 75.2° and 72.4°, ANB was −3.21° and 2.90°, SN-PP was 11.2° and 10.4°, Co-A was 84.3 mm and 87.5 mm, A-HR was 55.2 mm and 57.8 mm, A-VR was 62.4 mm and 64.7 mm, and SN-MP was 38.2 mm and 41.5 mm before and after treatment, respectively. Conclusion: FM proved to be beneficial in causing significant improvement in patients having combined cleft lip and palate.
format	article
author	Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Ravi Anjan Rehan Ahmad Khan Sana Shaikh
author_facet	Saurav Kumar Gaurav Verma Nadira Hassan Ravi Anjan Rehan Ahmad Khan Sana Shaikh
author_sort	Saurav Kumar
title	Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
title_short	Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
title_full	Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
title_fullStr	Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
title_full_unstemmed	Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
title_sort	facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9972bd499c42406ba0c5156acb434d4e
work_keys_str_mv	AT sauravkumar facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients AT gauravverma facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients AT nadirahassan facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients AT ravianjan facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients AT rehanahmadkhan facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients AT sanashaikh facemasktherapyinunilateralcleftlipandpalatepatients
_version_	1718420148332789760

Facemask therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

Ejemplares similares