Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019

Background: Kyasanur Forest disease (KFD) is a tick-borne zoonosis that is endemic in Karnataka. Against the backdrop of the recent geographical expansion of KFD, indicating the inadequacy of policy and surveillance systems, the present study was performed to evaluate the KFD surveillance system in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prashant Bhat, Jagadeesha H S, Mohan Kumar Raju, Sudheerchandra Sooda, Premanand K, Ravi Kumar
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/99bbc61b72064aa4a192d8e4c8240d5d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:99bbc61b72064aa4a192d8e4c8240d5d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:99bbc61b72064aa4a192d8e4c8240d5d2021-11-06T04:22:15ZKyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 20191201-971210.1016/j.ijid.2021.07.076https://doaj.org/article/99bbc61b72064aa4a192d8e4c8240d5d2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221006275https://doaj.org/toc/1201-9712Background: Kyasanur Forest disease (KFD) is a tick-borne zoonosis that is endemic in Karnataka. Against the backdrop of the recent geographical expansion of KFD, indicating the inadequacy of policy and surveillance systems, the present study was performed to evaluate the KFD surveillance system in Shivamogga. Methods: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for surveillance system evaluation were followed. Nine attributes of the system towards its objectives were evaluated in a mixed study in Shivamogga. Results: Two of three medical officers and four of six health staff at the institutions visited were found to be untrained in KFD surveillance. Integrated disease surveillance formats did not capture KFD data. Surveillance (tick, monkey, human) was mostly driven by the Health Department. Some of the critical findings of the evaluations were the absence of an animal and entomological surveillance line list, non-standardized reporting formats for human suspects, varying delays in the time-to-test across laboratories (2–16 days), and a lack of systematic data-sharing practices. Significant issues that emerged in the interview were deforestation with a change in ecosystem dynamics, limited diagnostic capacity, non-availability of point-of-care tests, outdated surveillance guidelines, a confusing surveillance perimeter (5 km), non-existing co-ownership among stakeholders, limited vaccine production capacity, and inadequate operational research. Conclusions: The system should consider integrating a One Health approach with defined ownership of activities among stakeholders. Revision of the guidelines is mandatory.Prashant BhatJagadeesha H SMohan Kumar RajuSudheerchandra SoodaPremanand KRavi KumarElsevierarticleKyasanur Forest DiseaseShivamoggaHaemorrhagic feverTick-borne diseaseInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216ENInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol 110, Iss , Pp S50-S61 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Kyasanur Forest Disease
Shivamogga
Haemorrhagic fever
Tick-borne disease
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
spellingShingle Kyasanur Forest Disease
Shivamogga
Haemorrhagic fever
Tick-borne disease
Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Prashant Bhat
Jagadeesha H S
Mohan Kumar Raju
Sudheerchandra Sooda
Premanand K
Ravi Kumar
Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
description Background: Kyasanur Forest disease (KFD) is a tick-borne zoonosis that is endemic in Karnataka. Against the backdrop of the recent geographical expansion of KFD, indicating the inadequacy of policy and surveillance systems, the present study was performed to evaluate the KFD surveillance system in Shivamogga. Methods: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for surveillance system evaluation were followed. Nine attributes of the system towards its objectives were evaluated in a mixed study in Shivamogga. Results: Two of three medical officers and four of six health staff at the institutions visited were found to be untrained in KFD surveillance. Integrated disease surveillance formats did not capture KFD data. Surveillance (tick, monkey, human) was mostly driven by the Health Department. Some of the critical findings of the evaluations were the absence of an animal and entomological surveillance line list, non-standardized reporting formats for human suspects, varying delays in the time-to-test across laboratories (2–16 days), and a lack of systematic data-sharing practices. Significant issues that emerged in the interview were deforestation with a change in ecosystem dynamics, limited diagnostic capacity, non-availability of point-of-care tests, outdated surveillance guidelines, a confusing surveillance perimeter (5 km), non-existing co-ownership among stakeholders, limited vaccine production capacity, and inadequate operational research. Conclusions: The system should consider integrating a One Health approach with defined ownership of activities among stakeholders. Revision of the guidelines is mandatory.
format article
author Prashant Bhat
Jagadeesha H S
Mohan Kumar Raju
Sudheerchandra Sooda
Premanand K
Ravi Kumar
author_facet Prashant Bhat
Jagadeesha H S
Mohan Kumar Raju
Sudheerchandra Sooda
Premanand K
Ravi Kumar
author_sort Prashant Bhat
title Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
title_short Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
title_full Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
title_fullStr Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
title_full_unstemmed Kyasanur Forest Disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? A mixed-method study, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India: 2019
title_sort kyasanur forest disease, is our surveillance system healthy to prevent a larger outbreak? a mixed-method study, shivamogga, karnataka, india: 2019
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/99bbc61b72064aa4a192d8e4c8240d5d
work_keys_str_mv AT prashantbhat kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
AT jagadeeshahs kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
AT mohankumarraju kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
AT sudheerchandrasooda kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
AT premanandk kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
AT ravikumar kyasanurforestdiseaseisoursurveillancesystemhealthytopreventalargeroutbreakamixedmethodstudyshivamoggakarnatakaindia2019
_version_ 1718443932081192960