Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression

Background: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guida...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: V.A. Cardenas, J.V. Bhat, A.M. Horwege, T.J. Ehrlich, J. Lavacot, D.H. Mathalon, G.H. Glover, B.J. Roach, B.W. Badran, S.D. Forman, M.S. George, M.E. Thase, J.A. Yesavage, D. Yurgelun-Todd, A.C. Rosen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa2021-11-14T04:31:37ZAnatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression1935-861X10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa2022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21008238https://doaj.org/toc/1935-861XBackground: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. Objective: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. Methods: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. Results: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. Conclusion: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems.V.A. CardenasJ.V. BhatA.M. HorwegeT.J. EhrlichJ. LavacotD.H. MathalonG.H. GloverB.J. RoachB.W. BadranS.D. FormanM.S. GeorgeM.E. ThaseJ.A. YesavageD. Yurgelun-ToddA.C. RosenElsevierarticleDepressionFunctional connectivityHCP atlasYeo atlasTMS targetingNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Stimulation, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 63-72 (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Depression
Functional connectivity
HCP atlas
Yeo atlas
TMS targeting
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle Depression
Functional connectivity
HCP atlas
Yeo atlas
TMS targeting
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
V.A. Cardenas
J.V. Bhat
A.M. Horwege
T.J. Ehrlich
J. Lavacot
D.H. Mathalon
G.H. Glover
B.J. Roach
B.W. Badran
S.D. Forman
M.S. George
M.E. Thase
J.A. Yesavage
D. Yurgelun-Todd
A.C. Rosen
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
description Background: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. Objective: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. Methods: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. Results: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. Conclusion: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems.
format article
author V.A. Cardenas
J.V. Bhat
A.M. Horwege
T.J. Ehrlich
J. Lavacot
D.H. Mathalon
G.H. Glover
B.J. Roach
B.W. Badran
S.D. Forman
M.S. George
M.E. Thase
J.A. Yesavage
D. Yurgelun-Todd
A.C. Rosen
author_facet V.A. Cardenas
J.V. Bhat
A.M. Horwege
T.J. Ehrlich
J. Lavacot
D.H. Mathalon
G.H. Glover
B.J. Roach
B.W. Badran
S.D. Forman
M.S. George
M.E. Thase
J.A. Yesavage
D. Yurgelun-Todd
A.C. Rosen
author_sort V.A. Cardenas
title Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_short Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_full Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_fullStr Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_sort anatomical and fmri-network comparison of multiple dlpfc targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa
work_keys_str_mv AT vacardenas anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT jvbhat anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT amhorwege anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT tjehrlich anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT jlavacot anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT dhmathalon anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT ghglover anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT bjroach anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT bwbadran anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT sdforman anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT msgeorge anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT methase anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT jayesavage anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT dyurgeluntodd anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT acrosen anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
_version_ 1718429972859715584