Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
Background: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guida...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa2021-11-14T04:31:37ZAnatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression1935-861X10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa2022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21008238https://doaj.org/toc/1935-861XBackground: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. Objective: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. Methods: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. Results: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. Conclusion: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems.V.A. CardenasJ.V. BhatA.M. HorwegeT.J. EhrlichJ. LavacotD.H. MathalonG.H. GloverB.J. RoachB.W. BadranS.D. FormanM.S. GeorgeM.E. ThaseJ.A. YesavageD. Yurgelun-ToddA.C. RosenElsevierarticleDepressionFunctional connectivityHCP atlasYeo atlasTMS targetingNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Stimulation, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 63-72 (2022) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Depression Functional connectivity HCP atlas Yeo atlas TMS targeting Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 |
spellingShingle |
Depression Functional connectivity HCP atlas Yeo atlas TMS targeting Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 V.A. Cardenas J.V. Bhat A.M. Horwege T.J. Ehrlich J. Lavacot D.H. Mathalon G.H. Glover B.J. Roach B.W. Badran S.D. Forman M.S. George M.E. Thase J.A. Yesavage D. Yurgelun-Todd A.C. Rosen Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
description |
Background: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. Objective: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. Methods: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. Results: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. Conclusion: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems. |
format |
article |
author |
V.A. Cardenas J.V. Bhat A.M. Horwege T.J. Ehrlich J. Lavacot D.H. Mathalon G.H. Glover B.J. Roach B.W. Badran S.D. Forman M.S. George M.E. Thase J.A. Yesavage D. Yurgelun-Todd A.C. Rosen |
author_facet |
V.A. Cardenas J.V. Bhat A.M. Horwege T.J. Ehrlich J. Lavacot D.H. Mathalon G.H. Glover B.J. Roach B.W. Badran S.D. Forman M.S. George M.E. Thase J.A. Yesavage D. Yurgelun-Todd A.C. Rosen |
author_sort |
V.A. Cardenas |
title |
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
title_short |
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
title_full |
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
title_fullStr |
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
title_sort |
anatomical and fmri-network comparison of multiple dlpfc targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9a19f97758cf46f8a0867ee51d6b02fa |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vacardenas anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT jvbhat anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT amhorwege anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT tjehrlich anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT jlavacot anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT dhmathalon anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT ghglover anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT bjroach anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT bwbadran anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT sdforman anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT msgeorge anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT methase anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT jayesavage anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT dyurgeluntodd anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression AT acrosen anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression |
_version_ |
1718429972859715584 |