Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes is very important and there are different criteria for diagnose of gestational diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare Carpenter– Coustan (C;C) and National Diabetes Data Group ( NDDG ) criteria in evaluation of adverse pregnan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	M Kashifard, Z Basirat
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2011
Materias:	carpenter–coustan national diabetes data group pregnancy gestational diabetes pregnancy outcome Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9a28385ce53c4d0fadfee5f341dddb95
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9a28385ce53c4d0fadfee5f341dddb95
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9a28385ce53c4d0fadfee5f341dddb952021-11-10T08:56:27ZComparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/9a28385ce53c4d0fadfee5f341dddb952011-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-3737-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes is very important and there are different criteria for diagnose of gestational diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare Carpenter– Coustan (C;C) and National Diabetes Data Group ( NDDG ) criteria in evaluation of adverse pregnancy outcomeMETHODS: This cohort study was done in prenatal care on 200 pregnant women who had abnormal GCT (Glucose challenge test) and normal GTT (Glucose tolerance test) based on NDDG criteria and 200 pregnant women (control group) who had normal GCT. Patients were compared in three groups included: normal GCT, normal GTT on both criteria and a group with normal GTT in NDDG criteria and abnormal GTT in C;C criteria for pregnancy outcome such as macrosomia, premature rupture membrane (PROM) need to cesarean section (C/S).FINDINGS: According to C;C criteria 24 (6%) patients had abnormal test but these patients was normal according NDDG criteria. PROM (OR=2.23, CI95%: 1.14-4.35), macrosomia (OR=3.73, CI95%: 1.54-9.01) and cesarean section (OR=1.73, CI95%: 1.05-2.84) in patients with abnormal test result according to both criteria was significantly higher than patients with normal GCT (control), but the risk of preeclampsia (OR=2.64, CI95%: 0.79-8.73) was not significantly different between the two groups. Risk of preeclampsia (OR=2.23, CI95%: 0.77-25.7) and cesarean section (OR=4.06, CI95%:0.92-17.8) in the group with only abnormal GTT by C;C criteria had higher than people who were normal by both criteria. Presence of at least one outcome (OR=7.6, CI95%:1.01-12.8) in the group with only abnormal GTT by C;C criteria had significantly higher than people who were normal by both criteria. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with normal GTT according to NDDG criteria but gestational diabetes by C;C was higher than women with normal GCT.M KashifardZ BasiratBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlecarpenter–coustannational diabetes data grouppregnancygestational diabetespregnancy outcomeMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 25-31 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	carpenter–coustan national diabetes data group pregnancy gestational diabetes pregnancy outcome Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	carpenter–coustan national diabetes data group pregnancy gestational diabetes pregnancy outcome Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 M Kashifard Z Basirat Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
description	BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes is very important and there are different criteria for diagnose of gestational diabetes. The aim of this study was to compare Carpenter– Coustan (C;C) and National Diabetes Data Group ( NDDG ) criteria in evaluation of adverse pregnancy outcomeMETHODS: This cohort study was done in prenatal care on 200 pregnant women who had abnormal GCT (Glucose challenge test) and normal GTT (Glucose tolerance test) based on NDDG criteria and 200 pregnant women (control group) who had normal GCT. Patients were compared in three groups included: normal GCT, normal GTT on both criteria and a group with normal GTT in NDDG criteria and abnormal GTT in C;C criteria for pregnancy outcome such as macrosomia, premature rupture membrane (PROM) need to cesarean section (C/S).FINDINGS: According to C;C criteria 24 (6%) patients had abnormal test but these patients was normal according NDDG criteria. PROM (OR=2.23, CI95%: 1.14-4.35), macrosomia (OR=3.73, CI95%: 1.54-9.01) and cesarean section (OR=1.73, CI95%: 1.05-2.84) in patients with abnormal test result according to both criteria was significantly higher than patients with normal GCT (control), but the risk of preeclampsia (OR=2.64, CI95%: 0.79-8.73) was not significantly different between the two groups. Risk of preeclampsia (OR=2.23, CI95%: 0.77-25.7) and cesarean section (OR=4.06, CI95%:0.92-17.8) in the group with only abnormal GTT by C;C criteria had higher than people who were normal by both criteria. Presence of at least one outcome (OR=7.6, CI95%:1.01-12.8) in the group with only abnormal GTT by C;C criteria had significantly higher than people who were normal by both criteria. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in patients with normal GTT according to NDDG criteria but gestational diabetes by C;C was higher than women with normal GCT.
format	article
author	M Kashifard Z Basirat
author_facet	M Kashifard Z Basirat
author_sort	M Kashifard
title	Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
title_short	Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
title_full	Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
title_fullStr	Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome
title_sort	comparison of carpenter– coustan criteria and national diabetes data group criteria in evaluation of adverse pregnancy outcome
publisher	Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/9a28385ce53c4d0fadfee5f341dddb95
work_keys_str_mv	AT mkashifard comparisonofcarpentercoustancriteriaandnationaldiabetesdatagroupcriteriainevaluationofadversepregnancyoutcome AT zbasirat comparisonofcarpentercoustancriteriaandnationaldiabetesdatagroupcriteriainevaluationofadversepregnancyoutcome
_version_	1718440309960998912

Comparison of Carpenter– Coustan Criteria and National Diabetes Data Group Criteria in Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome

Ejemplares similares