Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake

ABSTRACT Optimal feed efficiency (FE) in pigs is important for economic and environmental reasons. Previous research identified FE-associated bacterial taxa within the intestinal microbiota of growing pigs. This study investigated whether FE-associated bacteria and selected FE-associated physiologic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ursula M. McCormack, Tânia Curião, Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli, Elizabeth Magowan, Donagh P. Berry, Henry Reyer, Maria L. Prieto, Stefan G. Buzoianu, Michael Harrison, Natalie Rebeiz, Fiona Crispie, Paul D. Cotter, Orla O’Sullivan, Gillian E. Gardiner, Peadar G. Lawlor
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9a941dccb28b4753afa27310bcda9c79
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9a941dccb28b4753afa27310bcda9c79
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9a941dccb28b4753afa27310bcda9c792021-12-02T19:47:35ZPorcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake10.1128/mSystems.00324-182379-5077https://doaj.org/article/9a941dccb28b4753afa27310bcda9c792019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mSystems.00324-18https://doaj.org/toc/2379-5077ABSTRACT Optimal feed efficiency (FE) in pigs is important for economic and environmental reasons. Previous research identified FE-associated bacterial taxa within the intestinal microbiota of growing pigs. This study investigated whether FE-associated bacteria and selected FE-associated physiological traits were consistent across geographic locations (Republic of Ireland [ROI] [two batches of pigs, ROI1 and ROI2], Northern Ireland [NI], and Austria [AT]), where differences in genetic, dietary, and management factors were minimized. Pigs (n = 369) were ranked, within litter, on divergence in residual feed intake (RFI), and 100 extremes were selected (50 with high RFI and 50 with low RFI) across geographic locations for intestinal microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and examination of FE-associated physiological parameters. Microbial diversity varied by geographic location and intestinal sampling site but not by RFI rank, except in ROI2, where more-feed-efficient pigs had greater ileal and cecal diversity. Although none of the 188 RFI-associated taxonomic differences found were common to all locations/batches, Lentisphaerae, Ruminococcaceae, RF16, Mucispirillum, Methanobrevibacter, and two uncultured genera were more abundant within the fecal or cecal microbiota of low-RFI pigs in two geographic locations and/or in both ROI batches. These are major contributors to carbohydrate metabolism, which was reflected in functional predictions. Fecal volatile fatty acids and salivary cortisol were the only physiological parameters that differed between RFI ranks. Despite controlling genetics, diet specification, dietary phases, and management practices in each rearing environment, the rearing environment, encompassing maternal influence, herd health status, as well as other factors, appears to impact intestinal microbiota more than FE. IMPORTANCE Interest in the role of intestinal microbiota in determining FE in pigs has increased in recent years. However, it is not known if the same FE-associated bacteria are found across different rearing environments. In this study, geographic location and intestinal sampling site had a greater influence on the pig gut microbiome than FE. This presents challenges when aiming to identify consistent reliable microbial biomarkers for FE. Nonetheless, seven FE-associated microbial taxa were common across two geographic locations and/or two batches within one location, and these indicated a potentially “healthier” and metabolically more capable microbiota in more-feed-efficient pigs. These taxa could potentially be employed as biomarkers for FE, although bacterial consortia, rather than individual taxa, may be more likely to predict FE. They may also merit consideration for use as probiotics or could be targeted by dietary means as a strategy for improving FE in pigs in the future.Ursula M. McCormackTânia CuriãoBarbara U. Metzler-ZebeliElizabeth MagowanDonagh P. BerryHenry ReyerMaria L. PrietoStefan G. BuzoianuMichael HarrisonNatalie RebeizFiona CrispiePaul D. CotterOrla O’SullivanGillian E. GardinerPeadar G. LawlorAmerican Society for Microbiologyarticlefeed efficiencygeographic locationintestinal microbiotapigsMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmSystems, Vol 4, Iss 4 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic feed efficiency
geographic location
intestinal microbiota
pigs
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle feed efficiency
geographic location
intestinal microbiota
pigs
Microbiology
QR1-502
Ursula M. McCormack
Tânia Curião
Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli
Elizabeth Magowan
Donagh P. Berry
Henry Reyer
Maria L. Prieto
Stefan G. Buzoianu
Michael Harrison
Natalie Rebeiz
Fiona Crispie
Paul D. Cotter
Orla O’Sullivan
Gillian E. Gardiner
Peadar G. Lawlor
Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
description ABSTRACT Optimal feed efficiency (FE) in pigs is important for economic and environmental reasons. Previous research identified FE-associated bacterial taxa within the intestinal microbiota of growing pigs. This study investigated whether FE-associated bacteria and selected FE-associated physiological traits were consistent across geographic locations (Republic of Ireland [ROI] [two batches of pigs, ROI1 and ROI2], Northern Ireland [NI], and Austria [AT]), where differences in genetic, dietary, and management factors were minimized. Pigs (n = 369) were ranked, within litter, on divergence in residual feed intake (RFI), and 100 extremes were selected (50 with high RFI and 50 with low RFI) across geographic locations for intestinal microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and examination of FE-associated physiological parameters. Microbial diversity varied by geographic location and intestinal sampling site but not by RFI rank, except in ROI2, where more-feed-efficient pigs had greater ileal and cecal diversity. Although none of the 188 RFI-associated taxonomic differences found were common to all locations/batches, Lentisphaerae, Ruminococcaceae, RF16, Mucispirillum, Methanobrevibacter, and two uncultured genera were more abundant within the fecal or cecal microbiota of low-RFI pigs in two geographic locations and/or in both ROI batches. These are major contributors to carbohydrate metabolism, which was reflected in functional predictions. Fecal volatile fatty acids and salivary cortisol were the only physiological parameters that differed between RFI ranks. Despite controlling genetics, diet specification, dietary phases, and management practices in each rearing environment, the rearing environment, encompassing maternal influence, herd health status, as well as other factors, appears to impact intestinal microbiota more than FE. IMPORTANCE Interest in the role of intestinal microbiota in determining FE in pigs has increased in recent years. However, it is not known if the same FE-associated bacteria are found across different rearing environments. In this study, geographic location and intestinal sampling site had a greater influence on the pig gut microbiome than FE. This presents challenges when aiming to identify consistent reliable microbial biomarkers for FE. Nonetheless, seven FE-associated microbial taxa were common across two geographic locations and/or two batches within one location, and these indicated a potentially “healthier” and metabolically more capable microbiota in more-feed-efficient pigs. These taxa could potentially be employed as biomarkers for FE, although bacterial consortia, rather than individual taxa, may be more likely to predict FE. They may also merit consideration for use as probiotics or could be targeted by dietary means as a strategy for improving FE in pigs in the future.
format article
author Ursula M. McCormack
Tânia Curião
Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli
Elizabeth Magowan
Donagh P. Berry
Henry Reyer
Maria L. Prieto
Stefan G. Buzoianu
Michael Harrison
Natalie Rebeiz
Fiona Crispie
Paul D. Cotter
Orla O’Sullivan
Gillian E. Gardiner
Peadar G. Lawlor
author_facet Ursula M. McCormack
Tânia Curião
Barbara U. Metzler-Zebeli
Elizabeth Magowan
Donagh P. Berry
Henry Reyer
Maria L. Prieto
Stefan G. Buzoianu
Michael Harrison
Natalie Rebeiz
Fiona Crispie
Paul D. Cotter
Orla O’Sullivan
Gillian E. Gardiner
Peadar G. Lawlor
author_sort Ursula M. McCormack
title Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
title_short Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
title_full Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
title_fullStr Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
title_full_unstemmed Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake
title_sort porcine feed efficiency-associated intestinal microbiota and physiological traits: finding consistent cross-locational biomarkers for residual feed intake
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/9a941dccb28b4753afa27310bcda9c79
work_keys_str_mv AT ursulammccormack porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT taniacuriao porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT barbaraumetzlerzebeli porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT elizabethmagowan porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT donaghpberry porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT henryreyer porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT marialprieto porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT stefangbuzoianu porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT michaelharrison porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT natalierebeiz porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT fionacrispie porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT pauldcotter porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT orlaosullivan porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT gillianegardiner porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
AT peadarglawlor porcinefeedefficiencyassociatedintestinalmicrobiotaandphysiologicaltraitsfindingconsistentcrosslocationalbiomarkersforresidualfeedintake
_version_ 1718375977761898496