Paris Climate Agreement passes the cost-benefit test
Relative economic benefits of achieving temperature targets have not properly accounted for damages at higher temperatures. Here the authors integrate dynamic cost-benefit analysis with a damage-cost curve and show that the Paris Climate Agreement constitutes the economically optimal policy pathway...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Nicole Glanemann, Sven N. Willner, Anders Levermann |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9a9513caafdc43bf925b57c7c95be59c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Investment incentive reduced by climate damages can be restored by optimal policy
por: Sven N. Willner, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges
por: Toon Vandyck, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement
por: Mark Roelfsema, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing the Policy gaps for achieving China’s climate targets in the Paris Agreement
por: Kelly Sims Gallagher, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals
por: Mark G. Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2018)