Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly
Requirements for educating the next generation of scientists in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) were published approximately 25 years ago. Over the years, an extensive collThe advancement of science requires trust – trust in the literature, in our collaborators, in the data we are handed,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9aa33720d3a0493b8d021d0f4758c58e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9aa33720d3a0493b8d021d0f4758c58e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9aa33720d3a0493b8d021d0f4758c58e2021-11-15T15:15:36ZTeaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.8741935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/9aa33720d3a0493b8d021d0f4758c58e2014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.874https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885Requirements for educating the next generation of scientists in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) were published approximately 25 years ago. Over the years, an extensive collThe advancement of science requires trust – trust in the literature, in our collaborators, in the data we are handed, and most of all in ourselves. Policies issued by U.S. federal funding agencies (e.g., the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation) have been valuable in prompting institutions to initiate formal mechanisms for providing instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). However, the guidelines vary greatly in scope, detail, and the types of individuals to which they apply. Unfortunately, at many institutions, the provision of RCR instruction has become a bureaucratic exercise aimed at fulfilling a regulatory requirement, instead of an activity optimized for promoting a climate of integrity. We argue that for RCR instruction to be effective it should (1) be provided to everyone involved in the research enterprise, be they students, trainees, faculty, or staff, (2) be infused throughout one’s time at an institution. For graduate students, that would include from orientation to thesis completion, including integration into all “core classes” within their discipline, as well as into discussions at research group meetings. (3) We also advocate that the bulk of the instruction should be provided primarily by active researchers who know the issues and have relevance to, and credibly with, those being taught, and (4) that the instruction actively engages the learners. Not only will we be providing RCR instruction in a much more optimized manner, such an approach also emphasizes through our actions, not just in words, that behaving responsibly is an essential skill for researchersMichael J. ZigmondBeth A. FischerAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 83-87 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Michael J. Zigmond Beth A. Fischer Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
description |
Requirements for educating the next generation of scientists in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) were published approximately 25 years ago. Over the years, an extensive collThe advancement of science requires trust – trust in the literature, in our collaborators, in the data we are handed, and most of all in ourselves. Policies issued by U.S. federal funding agencies (e.g., the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation) have been valuable in prompting institutions to initiate formal mechanisms for providing instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). However, the guidelines vary greatly in scope, detail, and the types of individuals to which they apply. Unfortunately, at many institutions, the provision of RCR instruction has become a bureaucratic exercise aimed at fulfilling a regulatory requirement, instead of an activity optimized for promoting a climate of integrity. We argue that for RCR instruction to be effective it should (1) be provided to everyone involved in the research enterprise, be they students, trainees, faculty, or staff, (2) be infused throughout one’s time at an institution. For graduate students, that would include from orientation to thesis completion, including integration into all “core classes” within their discipline, as well as into discussions at research group meetings. (3) We also advocate that the bulk of the instruction should be provided primarily by active researchers who know the issues and have relevance to, and credibly with, those being taught, and (4) that the instruction actively engages the learners. Not only will we be providing RCR instruction in a much more optimized manner, such an approach also emphasizes through our actions, not just in words, that behaving responsibly is an essential skill for researchers |
format |
article |
author |
Michael J. Zigmond Beth A. Fischer |
author_facet |
Michael J. Zigmond Beth A. Fischer |
author_sort |
Michael J. Zigmond |
title |
Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
title_short |
Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
title_full |
Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
title_fullStr |
Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly |
title_sort |
teaching responsible conduct responsibly |
publisher |
American Society for Microbiology |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9aa33720d3a0493b8d021d0f4758c58e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaeljzigmond teachingresponsibleconductresponsibly AT bethafischer teachingresponsibleconductresponsibly |
_version_ |
1718428206706458624 |