Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula

Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons.The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although withquestionable benefit.Objectives: The aim of the st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Riyadh Mohamad Hasan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:	perianal abscess antibiotic empiric fistula Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9aaa79cb6ce54231b250a711279be504
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9aaa79cb6ce54231b250a711279be504
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9aaa79cb6ce54231b250a711279be5042021-11-16T07:43:30ZPostoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula2783-2430https://doaj.org/article/9aaa79cb6ce54231b250a711279be5042017-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://colorectalresearch.sums.ac.ir/article_47152_fe1ba948869e5e823bd4357e591abab7.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2783-2430Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons.The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although withquestionable benefit.Objectives: The aim of the study conducted was to evaluate the role and efficacy of intra- and post-operative empirical antibioticcombination with a wide antibacterial spectrum for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano.Methods: An observational longitudinal study consisted of 150 patients; 50% of them underwent incision and drainage of theirperianal abscess. The rest had fistula-in-ano and were treated with fistulotomy. Patients were prescribed a course of empiric antibioticsat the time of diagnosis. The prescribed antibiotic consisted of two regimes. The mechanism of the first regime was based oninhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas the second regime included antibiotics inhibiting protein synthesis of the bacteria.Afterwards, analysis of the effect of postoperative use of empiric antibiotics was performed regarding symptom assessment,recurrence rate of abscess, fistula formation, cellulitis, bacteremia and sepsis.Results: Among 150 patients included in the study, 92% were male and 8% were female. The age range was 20 to 66 years (mean 39.97 ± 0.16 years). Seventy-five of them had perianal abscess and the rest had fistula-in-ano. They were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics. Patients who had perianal abscess showed an abscess recurrence rate of 10% and 5% after six and twelve monthsrespectively. Perianal fistula formation occurred at the rate of 25% and 5% after six and twelve months respectivelywhenLincomycin treatment was used. Patients with perianal fistula treated with both fistulotomy and Lincomycin were followedupfor six and twelve months. Follow-up showed an 11.42% rate of abscess formation after six months, however no recurrence of fistula was found.Conclusions: The results of this study concluded that antibiotics administered after incision and drainage had reduced the rate of fistula formation, abscess recurrence, cellulitis and sepsis. Our limited patient sampling does not provide a definite conclusion, although it is clear that fistula formation is of clinical importance in the role of empiric antibiotics in preventing recurrence andmerits further study.Riyadh Mohamad HasanShiraz University of Medical Sciencesarticleperianal abscessantibioticempiricfistulaMedicineRENIranian Journal of Colorectal Research, Vol 5, Iss Issues 1-2, Pp 1-8 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	perianal abscess antibiotic empiric fistula Medicine R
spellingShingle	perianal abscess antibiotic empiric fistula Medicine R Riyadh Mohamad Hasan Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
description	Background: Perianal abscesses remain one of the most frequent surgical cases encountered by both general and colorectal surgeons.The use of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics for perianal abscesses after drainage also remains common, although withquestionable benefit.Objectives: The aim of the study conducted was to evaluate the role and efficacy of intra- and post-operative empirical antibioticcombination with a wide antibacterial spectrum for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano.Methods: An observational longitudinal study consisted of 150 patients; 50% of them underwent incision and drainage of theirperianal abscess. The rest had fistula-in-ano and were treated with fistulotomy. Patients were prescribed a course of empiric antibioticsat the time of diagnosis. The prescribed antibiotic consisted of two regimes. The mechanism of the first regime was based oninhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas the second regime included antibiotics inhibiting protein synthesis of the bacteria.Afterwards, analysis of the effect of postoperative use of empiric antibiotics was performed regarding symptom assessment,recurrence rate of abscess, fistula formation, cellulitis, bacteremia and sepsis.Results: Among 150 patients included in the study, 92% were male and 8% were female. The age range was 20 to 66 years (mean 39.97 ± 0.16 years). Seventy-five of them had perianal abscess and the rest had fistula-in-ano. They were prescribed a course of empiric antibiotics. Patients who had perianal abscess showed an abscess recurrence rate of 10% and 5% after six and twelve monthsrespectively. Perianal fistula formation occurred at the rate of 25% and 5% after six and twelve months respectivelywhenLincomycin treatment was used. Patients with perianal fistula treated with both fistulotomy and Lincomycin were followedupfor six and twelve months. Follow-up showed an 11.42% rate of abscess formation after six months, however no recurrence of fistula was found.Conclusions: The results of this study concluded that antibiotics administered after incision and drainage had reduced the rate of fistula formation, abscess recurrence, cellulitis and sepsis. Our limited patient sampling does not provide a definite conclusion, although it is clear that fistula formation is of clinical importance in the role of empiric antibiotics in preventing recurrence andmerits further study.
format	article
author	Riyadh Mohamad Hasan
author_facet	Riyadh Mohamad Hasan
author_sort	Riyadh Mohamad Hasan
title	Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
title_short	Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
title_full	Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
title_fullStr	Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
title_full_unstemmed	Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula
title_sort	postoperative empirical antibiotic use for uncomplicated perianal abscess and fistula
publisher	Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/9aaa79cb6ce54231b250a711279be504
work_keys_str_mv	AT riyadhmohamadhasan postoperativeempiricalantibioticuseforuncomplicatedperianalabscessandfistula
_version_	1718426621273178112

Postoperative Empirical Antibiotic Use for Uncomplicated Perianal Abscess and Fistula

Ejemplares similares