Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report

Abstract Background The value of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock, especially the combination of the ECMELLA approach (Impella combined with ECMO), remains controversial. Case presentation A previously healthy 33-year-old female patient was submitted to a local emergency dep...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Ebert, Nils Mungard, Alexander Mensch, Lorenz Homeister, Jan Willsch, Richard Ibe, Henning Baust, Markus Stiller, Artur Rebelo, Joerg Ukkat, Angelos G. Rigopoulos, Elke Weber, Michael Bucher, Michel Noutsias
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9aad95d778ac48e2b990cf46b6bb7644
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9aad95d778ac48e2b990cf46b6bb7644
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9aad95d778ac48e2b990cf46b6bb76442021-11-14T12:07:38ZCardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report10.1186/s12872-021-02346-21471-2261https://doaj.org/article/9aad95d778ac48e2b990cf46b6bb76442021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02346-2https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2261Abstract Background The value of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock, especially the combination of the ECMELLA approach (Impella combined with ECMO), remains controversial. Case presentation A previously healthy 33-year-old female patient was submitted to a local emergency department with a flu-like infection and febrile temperatures up to 39 °C. The patient was tested positive for type-A influenza, however negative for SARS-CoV-2. Despite escalated invasive ventilation, refractory hypercapnia (paCO2: 22 kPa) with severe respiratory acidosis (pH: 6.9) and a rising norepinephrine rate occurred within a few hours. Due to a Horovitz-Index < 100, out-of-centre veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO)-implantation was performed. A CT-scan done because of anisocoria revealed an extended dissection of the right vertebral artery. While the initial left ventricular function was normal, echocardiography revealed severe global hypokinesia. After angiographic exclusion of coronary artery stenoses, we geared up LV unloading by additional implantation of an Impella CP and expanded the vv-ECMO to a veno-venous-arterial ECMO (vva-ECMO). Clinically relevant bleeding from the punctured femoral arteries resulted in massive transfusion and was treated by vascular surgery later on. Under continued MCS, LVEF increased to approximately 40% 2 days after the initiation of ECMELLA. After weaning, the Impella CP was explanted at day 5 and the vva-ECMO was removed on day 9, respectively. The patient was discharged in an unaffected neurological condition to rehabilitation 25 days after the initial admission. Conclusions This exceptional case exemplifies the importance of aggressive MCS in severe cardiogenic shock, which may be especially promising in younger patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and potentially reversible causes of cardiogenic shock. This case impressively demonstrates that especially young patients may achieve complete neurological restoration, even though the initial prognosis may appear unfavourable.Daniel EbertNils MungardAlexander MenschLorenz HomeisterJan WillschRichard IbeHenning BaustMarkus StillerArtur RebeloJoerg UkkatAngelos G. RigopoulosElke WeberMichael BucherMichel NoutsiasBMCarticleCardiogenic shockCase reportECMOImpellaMechanical circulatory supportMyocarditisDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENBMC Cardiovascular Disorders, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cardiogenic shock
Case report
ECMO
Impella
Mechanical circulatory support
Myocarditis
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle Cardiogenic shock
Case report
ECMO
Impella
Mechanical circulatory support
Myocarditis
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Daniel Ebert
Nils Mungard
Alexander Mensch
Lorenz Homeister
Jan Willsch
Richard Ibe
Henning Baust
Markus Stiller
Artur Rebelo
Joerg Ukkat
Angelos G. Rigopoulos
Elke Weber
Michael Bucher
Michel Noutsias
Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
description Abstract Background The value of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiogenic shock, especially the combination of the ECMELLA approach (Impella combined with ECMO), remains controversial. Case presentation A previously healthy 33-year-old female patient was submitted to a local emergency department with a flu-like infection and febrile temperatures up to 39 °C. The patient was tested positive for type-A influenza, however negative for SARS-CoV-2. Despite escalated invasive ventilation, refractory hypercapnia (paCO2: 22 kPa) with severe respiratory acidosis (pH: 6.9) and a rising norepinephrine rate occurred within a few hours. Due to a Horovitz-Index < 100, out-of-centre veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO)-implantation was performed. A CT-scan done because of anisocoria revealed an extended dissection of the right vertebral artery. While the initial left ventricular function was normal, echocardiography revealed severe global hypokinesia. After angiographic exclusion of coronary artery stenoses, we geared up LV unloading by additional implantation of an Impella CP and expanded the vv-ECMO to a veno-venous-arterial ECMO (vva-ECMO). Clinically relevant bleeding from the punctured femoral arteries resulted in massive transfusion and was treated by vascular surgery later on. Under continued MCS, LVEF increased to approximately 40% 2 days after the initiation of ECMELLA. After weaning, the Impella CP was explanted at day 5 and the vva-ECMO was removed on day 9, respectively. The patient was discharged in an unaffected neurological condition to rehabilitation 25 days after the initial admission. Conclusions This exceptional case exemplifies the importance of aggressive MCS in severe cardiogenic shock, which may be especially promising in younger patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and potentially reversible causes of cardiogenic shock. This case impressively demonstrates that especially young patients may achieve complete neurological restoration, even though the initial prognosis may appear unfavourable.
format article
author Daniel Ebert
Nils Mungard
Alexander Mensch
Lorenz Homeister
Jan Willsch
Richard Ibe
Henning Baust
Markus Stiller
Artur Rebelo
Joerg Ukkat
Angelos G. Rigopoulos
Elke Weber
Michael Bucher
Michel Noutsias
author_facet Daniel Ebert
Nils Mungard
Alexander Mensch
Lorenz Homeister
Jan Willsch
Richard Ibe
Henning Baust
Markus Stiller
Artur Rebelo
Joerg Ukkat
Angelos G. Rigopoulos
Elke Weber
Michael Bucher
Michel Noutsias
author_sort Daniel Ebert
title Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
title_short Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
title_full Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
title_fullStr Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
title_full_unstemmed Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report
title_sort cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza a virus infection treated with vva-ecmo and impella cp (ecmella): a case report
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9aad95d778ac48e2b990cf46b6bb7644
work_keys_str_mv AT danielebert cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT nilsmungard cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT alexandermensch cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT lorenzhomeister cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT janwillsch cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT richardibe cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT henningbaust cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT markusstiller cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT arturrebelo cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT joergukkat cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT angelosgrigopoulos cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT elkeweber cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT michaelbucher cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
AT michelnoutsias cardiogenicshockwithhighlycomplicatedcourseafterinfluenzaavirusinfectiontreatedwithvvaecmoandimpellacpecmellaacasereport
_version_ 1718429419624726528