Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design

Peter Markus Spieth,1,2 Anne Sophie Kubasch,3 Ana Isabel Penzlin,4 Ben Min-Woo Illigens,2,5 Kristian Barlinn,6 Timo Siepmann2,6,7 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 2Center for Clinical Research a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spieth PM, Kubasch AS, Penzlin AI, Illigens BM, Barlinn K, Siepmann T
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
RCT
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9ab30a468bd84e0988fc49f57fb99f9d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9ab30a468bd84e0988fc49f57fb99f9d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9ab30a468bd84e0988fc49f57fb99f9d2021-12-02T00:43:35ZRandomized controlled trials – a matter of design1178-2021https://doaj.org/article/9ab30a468bd84e0988fc49f57fb99f9d2016-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/randomized-controlled-trials-nbspa-matter-of-design-peer-reviewed-article-NDThttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Peter Markus Spieth,1,2 Anne Sophie Kubasch,3 Ana Isabel Penzlin,4 Ben Min-Woo Illigens,2,5 Kristian Barlinn,6 Timo Siepmann2,6,7 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 2Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Division of Health Care Sciences, Dresden International University, 3Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Children’s Hospital, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 4Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 5Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 6Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 7Radcliffe Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis for translating research data into clinical practice. This review summarizes commonly applied designs and quality indicators of RCTs to provide guidance in interpreting and critically evaluating clinical research data. It further reflects on the principle of equipoise and its practical applicability to clinical science with an emphasis on critical care and neurological research. We performed a review of educational material, review articles, methodological studies, and published clinical trials using the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most relevant recommendations regarding design, conduction, and reporting of RCTs may include the following: 1) clinically relevant end points should be defined a priori, and an unbiased analysis and report of the study results should be warranted, 2) both significant and nonsignificant results should be objectively reported and published, 3) structured study design and performance as indicated in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement should be employed as well as registration in a public trial database, 4) potential conflicts of interest and funding sources should be disclaimed in study report or publication, and 5) in the comparison of experimental treatment with standard care, preplanned interim analyses during an ongoing RCT can aid in maintaining clinical equipoise by assessing benefit, harm, or futility, thus allowing decision on continuation or termination of the trial. Keywords: randomized clinical trials, RCT, validity, study design, CONSORTSpieth PMKubasch ASPenzlin AIIlligens BMBarlinn KSiepmann TDove Medical PressarticleRandomized Clinical TrialsRCTValidityStudy DesignCONSORTNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 1341-1349 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Randomized Clinical Trials
RCT
Validity
Study Design
CONSORT
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trials
RCT
Validity
Study Design
CONSORT
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Spieth PM
Kubasch AS
Penzlin AI
Illigens BM
Barlinn K
Siepmann T
Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
description Peter Markus Spieth,1,2 Anne Sophie Kubasch,3 Ana Isabel Penzlin,4 Ben Min-Woo Illigens,2,5 Kristian Barlinn,6 Timo Siepmann2,6,7 1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 2Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Division of Health Care Sciences, Dresden International University, 3Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Children’s Hospital, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 4Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 5Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 6Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany; 7Radcliffe Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis for translating research data into clinical practice. This review summarizes commonly applied designs and quality indicators of RCTs to provide guidance in interpreting and critically evaluating clinical research data. It further reflects on the principle of equipoise and its practical applicability to clinical science with an emphasis on critical care and neurological research. We performed a review of educational material, review articles, methodological studies, and published clinical trials using the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most relevant recommendations regarding design, conduction, and reporting of RCTs may include the following: 1) clinically relevant end points should be defined a priori, and an unbiased analysis and report of the study results should be warranted, 2) both significant and nonsignificant results should be objectively reported and published, 3) structured study design and performance as indicated in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement should be employed as well as registration in a public trial database, 4) potential conflicts of interest and funding sources should be disclaimed in study report or publication, and 5) in the comparison of experimental treatment with standard care, preplanned interim analyses during an ongoing RCT can aid in maintaining clinical equipoise by assessing benefit, harm, or futility, thus allowing decision on continuation or termination of the trial. Keywords: randomized clinical trials, RCT, validity, study design, CONSORT
format article
author Spieth PM
Kubasch AS
Penzlin AI
Illigens BM
Barlinn K
Siepmann T
author_facet Spieth PM
Kubasch AS
Penzlin AI
Illigens BM
Barlinn K
Siepmann T
author_sort Spieth PM
title Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
title_short Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
title_full Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
title_sort randomized controlled trials – a matter of design
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/9ab30a468bd84e0988fc49f57fb99f9d
work_keys_str_mv AT spiethpm randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
AT kubaschas randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
AT penzlinai randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
AT illigensbm randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
AT barlinnk randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
AT siepmannt randomizedcontrolledtrialsndashamatterofdesign
_version_ 1718403514072301568