Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.

Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Josilene Maria Ferreira Pinheiro, Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor, Cristiane da Silva Ramos Marinho, Vanessa Cristina da Costa Pires, Luana Isabelly Carneiro de Oliveira, Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Bezerra, Jéssica Rodrigues Clementino, Fábia Barbosa de Andrade
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9ac8eacd1fe742c3a0d22b816ed3ccce
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9ac8eacd1fe742c3a0d22b816ed3ccce
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9ac8eacd1fe742c3a0d22b816ed3ccce2021-12-02T20:14:38ZPrevalence of the five newborn screening tests.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257282https://doaj.org/article/9ac8eacd1fe742c3a0d22b816ed3ccce2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257282https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to evaluate the lingual frenulum and identify communication and feeding problems; (5) the Guthrie test to screen for metabolic diseases. This study investigated the prevalence of the five neonatal screening tests and its associated institutional and socio-cultural factors using a cross-sectional study with 415 mother and baby binomials from public maternity hospitals in Natal, RN, Brazil in 2019. Pearson's chi-squared, Mann-Whitney and Poisson regression tests were used, with a significance of p ≤ 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. The sample loss was 71 mothers (17%). The prevalence in the first week and at the end of 28 days was 93% and 99.5% (pulse oximetry screening), 60% and 97.6% (red reflex examination), 71.9% and 93.6% (Guthrie test), 35.5% and 68.2% (hearing screening test), and 19% and 48.9% (tongue test). Only 152 newborns (36.6%) underwent all five tests. The performance of the tests was associated in the final model (p ≤ 0.05) with the residence of the mothers in the state capital (PR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.18-1.56) and the provision of guidance for mothers about the five tests in maternity hospitals (PR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.08-1.67). None of the tests met full coverage, and regional inequities were identified indicating the need to restructure the institutions, training and qualification procedures to improve of the work processes and longitudinal care.Josilene Maria Ferreira PinheiroTaiana Brito Menêzes FlorCristiane da Silva Ramos MarinhoVanessa Cristina da Costa PiresLuana Isabelly Carneiro de OliveiraMara Rúbia de Oliveira BezerraJéssica Rodrigues ClementinoFábia Barbosa de AndradePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257282 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Josilene Maria Ferreira Pinheiro Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor Cristiane da Silva Ramos Marinho Vanessa Cristina da Costa Pires Luana Isabelly Carneiro de Oliveira Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Bezerra Jéssica Rodrigues Clementino Fábia Barbosa de Andrade Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
description	Neonatal screening is essential for child health and has the following purposes: (1) pulse oximetry screening to evaluate congenital heart diseases; (2) red reflex examination to investigate eye diseases; (3) newborn hearing screening test to evaluate congenital hearing diseases; (4) tongue test to evaluate the lingual frenulum and identify communication and feeding problems; (5) the Guthrie test to screen for metabolic diseases. This study investigated the prevalence of the five neonatal screening tests and its associated institutional and socio-cultural factors using a cross-sectional study with 415 mother and baby binomials from public maternity hospitals in Natal, RN, Brazil in 2019. Pearson's chi-squared, Mann-Whitney and Poisson regression tests were used, with a significance of p ≤ 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. The sample loss was 71 mothers (17%). The prevalence in the first week and at the end of 28 days was 93% and 99.5% (pulse oximetry screening), 60% and 97.6% (red reflex examination), 71.9% and 93.6% (Guthrie test), 35.5% and 68.2% (hearing screening test), and 19% and 48.9% (tongue test). Only 152 newborns (36.6%) underwent all five tests. The performance of the tests was associated in the final model (p ≤ 0.05) with the residence of the mothers in the state capital (PR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.18-1.56) and the provision of guidance for mothers about the five tests in maternity hospitals (PR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.08-1.67). None of the tests met full coverage, and regional inequities were identified indicating the need to restructure the institutions, training and qualification procedures to improve of the work processes and longitudinal care.
format	article
author	Josilene Maria Ferreira Pinheiro Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor Cristiane da Silva Ramos Marinho Vanessa Cristina da Costa Pires Luana Isabelly Carneiro de Oliveira Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Bezerra Jéssica Rodrigues Clementino Fábia Barbosa de Andrade
author_facet	Josilene Maria Ferreira Pinheiro Taiana Brito Menêzes Flor Cristiane da Silva Ramos Marinho Vanessa Cristina da Costa Pires Luana Isabelly Carneiro de Oliveira Mara Rúbia de Oliveira Bezerra Jéssica Rodrigues Clementino Fábia Barbosa de Andrade
author_sort	Josilene Maria Ferreira Pinheiro
title	Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
title_short	Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
title_full	Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
title_fullStr	Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
title_full_unstemmed	Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
title_sort	prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9ac8eacd1fe742c3a0d22b816ed3ccce
work_keys_str_mv	AT josilenemariaferreirapinheiro prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT taianabritomenezesflor prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT cristianedasilvaramosmarinho prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT vanessacristinadacostapires prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT luanaisabellycarneirodeoliveira prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT mararubiadeoliveirabezerra prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT jessicarodriguesclementino prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests AT fabiabarbosadeandrade prevalenceofthefivenewbornscreeningtests
_version_	1718374661572526080

Prevalence of the five newborn screening tests.

Ejemplares similares