Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
EXARC
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b2021-12-01T14:42:31ZCrafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums2212-8956https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b2013-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10097https://doaj.org/toc/2212-8956How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to accept alternative histories. A museum is one such example. The buildings are constructed for displays, the people are only performers and the sounds and smells are fabricated, but the experiences, though they vary from person to person, are real. At museums the public and the interpreters interact in a shared space but not a shared mindset. By borrowing from Mark Leone’s critical theory it is possible to examine the dissonance between the museum’s production of history and the public’s perception.Katherine Ambry Linhein MullerEXARCarticletheoryliving historyinterpretationopen-air museumheritagenewest erausaMuseums. Collectors and collectingAM1-501ArchaeologyCC1-960ENEXARC Journal, Iss 2013/1 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
theory living history interpretation open-air museum heritage newest era usa Museums. Collectors and collecting AM1-501 Archaeology CC1-960 |
spellingShingle |
theory living history interpretation open-air museum heritage newest era usa Museums. Collectors and collecting AM1-501 Archaeology CC1-960 Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
description |
How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to accept alternative histories. A museum is one such example. The buildings are constructed for displays, the people are only performers and the sounds and smells are fabricated, but the experiences, though they vary from person to person, are real. At museums the public and the interpreters interact in a shared space but not a shared mindset. By borrowing from Mark Leone’s critical theory it is possible to examine the dissonance between the museum’s production of history and the public’s perception. |
format |
article |
author |
Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller |
author_facet |
Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller |
author_sort |
Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller |
title |
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
title_short |
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
title_full |
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
title_fullStr |
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums |
title_sort |
crafting the past: theory and practice of museums |
publisher |
EXARC |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katherineambrylinheinmuller craftingthepasttheoryandpracticeofmuseums |
_version_ |
1718404952090476544 |