Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums

How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: EXARC 2013
Materias:
usa
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b2021-12-01T14:42:31ZCrafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums2212-8956https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b2013-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10097https://doaj.org/toc/2212-8956How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to accept alternative histories. A museum is one such example. The buildings are constructed for displays, the people are only performers and the sounds and smells are fabricated, but the experiences, though they vary from person to person, are real. At museums the public and the interpreters interact in a shared space but not a shared mindset. By borrowing from Mark Leone’s critical theory it is possible to examine the dissonance between the museum’s production of history and the public’s perception.Katherine Ambry Linhein MullerEXARCarticletheoryliving historyinterpretationopen-air museumheritagenewest erausaMuseums. Collectors and collectingAM1-501ArchaeologyCC1-960ENEXARC Journal, Iss 2013/1 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic theory
living history
interpretation
open-air museum
heritage
newest era
usa
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
spellingShingle theory
living history
interpretation
open-air museum
heritage
newest era
usa
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller
Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
description How do we know something is real? We say something exists when it is tangible and we can touch it; it is factual when we can compare it to other known variables, and historic when it fulfils our expectation of the past. There are objects and activities that blur these categories and cause people to accept alternative histories. A museum is one such example. The buildings are constructed for displays, the people are only performers and the sounds and smells are fabricated, but the experiences, though they vary from person to person, are real. At museums the public and the interpreters interact in a shared space but not a shared mindset. By borrowing from Mark Leone’s critical theory it is possible to examine the dissonance between the museum’s production of history and the public’s perception.
format article
author Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller
author_facet Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller
author_sort Katherine Ambry Linhein Muller
title Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
title_short Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
title_full Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
title_fullStr Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
title_full_unstemmed Crafting the Past: Theory and Practice of Museums
title_sort crafting the past: theory and practice of museums
publisher EXARC
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/9b3fefbda8864d1692b9aedf8c65b34b
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineambrylinheinmuller craftingthepasttheoryandpracticeofmuseums
_version_ 1718404952090476544