Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study

Abstract Comprehensive evaluation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is inadequate. This single-centre, retrospective observational study was designed to compare their efficacy, com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu Cheng, Chuying Qin, Peng Xu, Yijian Li, Mou Peng, Shuiqing Wu, Da Ren, Lizhi Zhou, Yinhuai Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9b7629087bbf4d0ca7a7528f6bd297f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9b7629087bbf4d0ca7a7528f6bd297f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9b7629087bbf4d0ca7a7528f6bd297f92021-12-02T15:55:21ZComparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study10.1038/s41598-021-89623-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9b7629087bbf4d0ca7a7528f6bd297f92021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89623-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Comprehensive evaluation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is inadequate. This single-centre, retrospective observational study was designed to compare their efficacy, complications and sexual function. A total of 215 patients under PVP or PKRP were included in the study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the baseline characteristics of the two groups, and perioperative and three-year follow-up data were compared between them. Finally, 120 patients (60 for PVP and 60 for PKRP) were matched after PSM. Compared with the PKRP group, the intraoperative haemoglobin loss was lower (9.08 vs 13.75 g/L, P < 0.001) and the duration of catheterization and postoperative hospital stay were shorter (2.97 vs 4.10 day, P < 0.001; 3.95 vs 5.13 day, P < 0.001, respectively), but the operation time was longer (56.72 vs 49, 90 min, P < 0.001) in the PVP group. Urination measurements were improved for both groups after surgery, although no significant differences were found between them during follow-up. Sexual function after surgery was partly increased; however, frequent retrograde and discomfortable ejaculation occurred in both groups. In addition, dysuria incidence and retreatment were higher in the PVP group at 12 months. In conclusion, PVP is safe and effective in relieving BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms with less perioperative blood loss and earlier recovery without inferior sexual function effects. However, the study is potentially affected by residual unmeasured confounding.Xu ChengChuying QinPeng XuYijian LiMou PengShuiqing WuDa RenLizhi ZhouYinhuai WangNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xu Cheng
Chuying Qin
Peng Xu
Yijian Li
Mou Peng
Shuiqing Wu
Da Ren
Lizhi Zhou
Yinhuai Wang
Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
description Abstract Comprehensive evaluation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is inadequate. This single-centre, retrospective observational study was designed to compare their efficacy, complications and sexual function. A total of 215 patients under PVP or PKRP were included in the study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the baseline characteristics of the two groups, and perioperative and three-year follow-up data were compared between them. Finally, 120 patients (60 for PVP and 60 for PKRP) were matched after PSM. Compared with the PKRP group, the intraoperative haemoglobin loss was lower (9.08 vs 13.75 g/L, P < 0.001) and the duration of catheterization and postoperative hospital stay were shorter (2.97 vs 4.10 day, P < 0.001; 3.95 vs 5.13 day, P < 0.001, respectively), but the operation time was longer (56.72 vs 49, 90 min, P < 0.001) in the PVP group. Urination measurements were improved for both groups after surgery, although no significant differences were found between them during follow-up. Sexual function after surgery was partly increased; however, frequent retrograde and discomfortable ejaculation occurred in both groups. In addition, dysuria incidence and retreatment were higher in the PVP group at 12 months. In conclusion, PVP is safe and effective in relieving BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms with less perioperative blood loss and earlier recovery without inferior sexual function effects. However, the study is potentially affected by residual unmeasured confounding.
format article
author Xu Cheng
Chuying Qin
Peng Xu
Yijian Li
Mou Peng
Shuiqing Wu
Da Ren
Lizhi Zhou
Yinhuai Wang
author_facet Xu Cheng
Chuying Qin
Peng Xu
Yijian Li
Mou Peng
Shuiqing Wu
Da Ren
Lizhi Zhou
Yinhuai Wang
author_sort Xu Cheng
title Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
title_short Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
title_full Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
title_sort comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9b7629087bbf4d0ca7a7528f6bd297f9
work_keys_str_mv AT xucheng comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT chuyingqin comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pengxu comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yijianli comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT moupeng comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shuiqingwu comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT daren comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lizhizhou comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yinhuaiwang comparisonofbipolarplasmakineticresectionofprostateversusphotoselectivevaporizationofprostatebyathreeyearretrospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1718385407985451008