The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education

Sign bilingual education, for the purpose of this article, is defined as a program at primary or secondary school where sign language is used as the first language of instruction with spoken/written language (e.g. English) as the second language (Knoors et al., 2014). International research on sign...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Noel O'Connell
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
GA
GD
Publicado: The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9bbe848339894d0da52e673fcbeecd23
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9bbe848339894d0da52e673fcbeecd23
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9bbe848339894d0da52e673fcbeecd232021-11-27T16:06:57ZThe Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education0332-205X2565-6325https://doaj.org/article/9bbe848339894d0da52e673fcbeecd232021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/1275https://doaj.org/toc/0332-205Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2565-6325 Sign bilingual education, for the purpose of this article, is defined as a program at primary or secondary school where sign language is used as the first language of instruction with spoken/written language (e.g. English) as the second language (Knoors et al., 2014). International research on sign bilingual education has been on the rise over the last twenty years to the extent that researchers can no longer ignore its importance in an Irish context. The aim of this article is to establish whether or not a case should be made for sign bilingual education in Ireland. Based on a review of international literature, the article begins by discussing the historical development of sign bilingualism. It then discusses each of the key objectives for such a programme outlined in Marschark et al. (2014): (1) the promotion of first (sign) language acquisition to support literacy and numeracy skills in the second (spoken) language; (2) to use an accessible, visual language as a way to unlock the curriculum for deaf students; (3) to improve proficiency in the written and spoken language of the majority population; (4) to enhance deaf children’s social, emotional and positive identity development and their academic achievement. The study concludes with the argument that, although empirical evidence is limited, there are sufficient grounds for promoting a debate on sign bilingual education at policy level in Ireland.   Noel O'ConnellThe Irish Association for Applied LinguisticsarticleSign bilingualismdeaf educationdeaf communitiessign languagedeaf childrenPhilology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENGAGDTeanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics , Vol 28 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
GA
GD
topic Sign bilingualism
deaf education
deaf communities
sign language
deaf children
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle Sign bilingualism
deaf education
deaf communities
sign language
deaf children
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Noel O'Connell
The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
description Sign bilingual education, for the purpose of this article, is defined as a program at primary or secondary school where sign language is used as the first language of instruction with spoken/written language (e.g. English) as the second language (Knoors et al., 2014). International research on sign bilingual education has been on the rise over the last twenty years to the extent that researchers can no longer ignore its importance in an Irish context. The aim of this article is to establish whether or not a case should be made for sign bilingual education in Ireland. Based on a review of international literature, the article begins by discussing the historical development of sign bilingualism. It then discusses each of the key objectives for such a programme outlined in Marschark et al. (2014): (1) the promotion of first (sign) language acquisition to support literacy and numeracy skills in the second (spoken) language; (2) to use an accessible, visual language as a way to unlock the curriculum for deaf students; (3) to improve proficiency in the written and spoken language of the majority population; (4) to enhance deaf children’s social, emotional and positive identity development and their academic achievement. The study concludes with the argument that, although empirical evidence is limited, there are sufficient grounds for promoting a debate on sign bilingual education at policy level in Ireland.  
format article
author Noel O'Connell
author_facet Noel O'Connell
author_sort Noel O'Connell
title The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
title_short The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
title_full The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
title_fullStr The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
title_full_unstemmed The Case for Sign Bilingualism in Irish Deaf Education
title_sort case for sign bilingualism in irish deaf education
publisher The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9bbe848339894d0da52e673fcbeecd23
work_keys_str_mv AT noeloconnell thecaseforsignbilingualisminirishdeafeducation
AT noeloconnell caseforsignbilingualisminirishdeafeducation
_version_ 1718408455230849024