Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching

Abstract Developmental plasticity can match offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions experienced by parents. Such epigenetic modifications are advantageous when parental conditions anticipate offspring environments. Here we show firstly, that developmental plasticity manifests differently in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Amélie Le Roy, Isabella Loughland, Frank Seebacher
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9bc760d19ea143e487bf2f719e597750
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9bc760d19ea143e487bf2f719e597750
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9bc760d19ea143e487bf2f719e5977502021-12-02T12:31:58ZDifferential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching10.1038/s41598-017-03300-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9bc760d19ea143e487bf2f719e5977502017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03300-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Developmental plasticity can match offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions experienced by parents. Such epigenetic modifications are advantageous when parental conditions anticipate offspring environments. Here we show firstly, that developmental plasticity manifests differently in males and females. Secondly, that under stable conditions, phenotypic responses (metabolism and locomotion) accumulate across several generations. Metabolic scope in males was greater at warmer test temperatures (26–36 °C) in offspring bred at warm temperatures (29–30 °C) compared to those bred at cooler temperatures (22–23 °C), lending support to the predictive adaptive hypothesis. However, this transgenerational matching was not established until the second (F2) generation. For other responses, e.g. swimming performance in females, phenotypes of offspring bred in different thermal environments were different in the first (F1) generation, but became more similar across three generations, implying canalization. Thirdly, when environments changed across generations, the grandparental environment affected offspring phenotypes. In females, the mode of the swimming thermal performance curve shifted to coincide with the grandparental rather than the parental or offspring developmental environments, and this lag in response may represent a cost of plasticity. These findings show that the effects of developmental plasticity differ between traits, and may be modulated by the different life histories of males and females.Amélie Le RoyIsabella LoughlandFrank SeebacherNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Amélie Le Roy Isabella Loughland Frank Seebacher Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
description	Abstract Developmental plasticity can match offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions experienced by parents. Such epigenetic modifications are advantageous when parental conditions anticipate offspring environments. Here we show firstly, that developmental plasticity manifests differently in males and females. Secondly, that under stable conditions, phenotypic responses (metabolism and locomotion) accumulate across several generations. Metabolic scope in males was greater at warmer test temperatures (26–36 °C) in offspring bred at warm temperatures (29–30 °C) compared to those bred at cooler temperatures (22–23 °C), lending support to the predictive adaptive hypothesis. However, this transgenerational matching was not established until the second (F2) generation. For other responses, e.g. swimming performance in females, phenotypes of offspring bred in different thermal environments were different in the first (F1) generation, but became more similar across three generations, implying canalization. Thirdly, when environments changed across generations, the grandparental environment affected offspring phenotypes. In females, the mode of the swimming thermal performance curve shifted to coincide with the grandparental rather than the parental or offspring developmental environments, and this lag in response may represent a cost of plasticity. These findings show that the effects of developmental plasticity differ between traits, and may be modulated by the different life histories of males and females.
format	article
author	Amélie Le Roy Isabella Loughland Frank Seebacher
author_facet	Amélie Le Roy Isabella Loughland Frank Seebacher
author_sort	Amélie Le Roy
title	Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
title_short	Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
title_full	Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
title_fullStr	Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
title_full_unstemmed	Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
title_sort	differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/9bc760d19ea143e487bf2f719e597750
work_keys_str_mv	AT amelieleroy differentialeffectsofdevelopmentalthermalplasticityacrossthreegenerationsofguppiespoeciliareticulatacanalizationandanticipatorymatching AT isabellaloughland differentialeffectsofdevelopmentalthermalplasticityacrossthreegenerationsofguppiespoeciliareticulatacanalizationandanticipatorymatching AT frankseebacher differentialeffectsofdevelopmentalthermalplasticityacrossthreegenerationsofguppiespoeciliareticulatacanalizationandanticipatorymatching
_version_	1718394231019536384

Differential effects of developmental thermal plasticity across three generations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata): canalization and anticipatory matching

Ejemplares similares