Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?

Hannah CP Wilson,1 Paul D Abel,2 S Imran A Shah2 1Department of Post-graduate Students, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 2Department of surgery and cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UKFurther to the recent publication on the “Repeated vertebral...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson HCP, Abel PD, Shah SIA
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9bca83d7411343309bdd3c9ac0037658
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9bca83d7411343309bdd3c9ac0037658
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9bca83d7411343309bdd3c9ac00376582021-12-02T05:07:03ZRepeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/9bca83d7411343309bdd3c9ac00376582015-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/letter-repeated-vertebral-augmentation-for-new-vertebral-compre-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Hannah CP Wilson,1 Paul D Abel,2 S Imran A Shah2 1Department of Post-graduate Students, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 2Department of surgery and cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UKFurther to the recent publication on the “Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study”,1 current data highlight the limitations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. In this context, at best, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (which measure bone mineral density) can account for no greater than 50% of overall bone strength (defined as the ability to resist fracture). This is because the resulting images are two-dimensional and therefore unable to capture skeletal micro-architecture, which also contributes to bone strength.2 View original article by Liang et al Wilson HCPAbel PDShah SIADove Medical PressarticleBone mineral densityfracture riskCT-scanGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1653-1655 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bone mineral density
fracture risk
CT-scan
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
spellingShingle Bone mineral density
fracture risk
CT-scan
Geriatrics
RC952-954.6
Wilson HCP
Abel PD
Shah SIA
Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
description Hannah CP Wilson,1 Paul D Abel,2 S Imran A Shah2 1Department of Post-graduate Students, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 2Department of surgery and cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UKFurther to the recent publication on the “Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study”,1 current data highlight the limitations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. In this context, at best, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (which measure bone mineral density) can account for no greater than 50% of overall bone strength (defined as the ability to resist fracture). This is because the resulting images are two-dimensional and therefore unable to capture skeletal micro-architecture, which also contributes to bone strength.2 View original article by Liang et al 
format article
author Wilson HCP
Abel PD
Shah SIA
author_facet Wilson HCP
Abel PD
Shah SIA
author_sort Wilson HCP
title Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
title_short Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
title_full Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
title_fullStr Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
title_full_unstemmed Repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
title_sort repeated vertebral augmentation for new vertebral compression fractures of postvertebral augmentation patients: a nationwide cohort study – how useful is the current clinical gold standard for fracture risk?
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/9bca83d7411343309bdd3c9ac0037658
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonhcp repeatedvertebralaugmentationfornewvertebralcompressionfracturesofpostvertebralaugmentationpatientsanationwidecohortstudyndashhowusefulisthecurrentclinicalgoldstandardforfracturerisk
AT abelpd repeatedvertebralaugmentationfornewvertebralcompressionfracturesofpostvertebralaugmentationpatientsanationwidecohortstudyndashhowusefulisthecurrentclinicalgoldstandardforfracturerisk
AT shahsia repeatedvertebralaugmentationfornewvertebralcompressionfracturesofpostvertebralaugmentationpatientsanationwidecohortstudyndashhowusefulisthecurrentclinicalgoldstandardforfracturerisk
_version_ 1718400608344473600