Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

Background:. Skin lesions and traumas can affect the skin by leaving scars. The purpose of this study was evaluating the results of a new technique in reconstructive surgery of scars on the nose. In this technique, extra skin remaining from reduction rhinoplasty is applied to the defect remained fro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmood Omranifard, MD, Neda Zare, MD, Maryam Mahabadi, MD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9bd451e18fd74d7aa84da879115b20bc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9bd451e18fd74d7aa84da879115b20bc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9bd451e18fd74d7aa84da879115b20bc2021-11-25T07:58:04ZConcurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study2169-757410.1097/GOX.0000000000003908https://doaj.org/article/9bd451e18fd74d7aa84da879115b20bc2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003908https://doaj.org/toc/2169-7574Background:. Skin lesions and traumas can affect the skin by leaving scars. The purpose of this study was evaluating the results of a new technique in reconstructive surgery of scars on the nose. In this technique, extra skin remaining from reduction rhinoplasty is applied to the defect remained from removing the scar. Methods:. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study performed on 33 patients who underwent reduction rhinoplasty from 2013 to 2018 due to scars on the dorsal nasal skin. Five sets of standards, criteria, and questionnaires were used to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes, scars, and nasal function. These included the Cakir concept, visual analogue scale, patient reported outcome measurement, Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, and sino-nasal outcome test-22. Results:. According to the surface polygon concept, or Cakir concept, the number of affected polygons due to scars decreased in all included patients (P < 0.05). In addition, constant improvement in patients’ satisfaction, based on patient reported outcome measurement (P < 0.001) and visual analogue scale (P ≤ 0.05), as well as physicians’ satisfaction, based on Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, were determined. Furthermore, evaluating the patients’ breathing, based on sino-nasal outcome test-22 criteria (P < 0.09), indicated no adverse effects. Conclusion:. Excision of scars from dorsal nasal skin and conducting rhinoplasty surgery from the same access can be considered an option for reconstructing nasal scars.Mahmood Omranifard, MDNeda Zare, MDMaryam Mahabadi, MDWolters KluwerarticleSurgeryRD1-811ENPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open, Vol 9, Iss 11, p e3908 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Surgery
RD1-811
Mahmood Omranifard, MD
Neda Zare, MD
Maryam Mahabadi, MD
Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
description Background:. Skin lesions and traumas can affect the skin by leaving scars. The purpose of this study was evaluating the results of a new technique in reconstructive surgery of scars on the nose. In this technique, extra skin remaining from reduction rhinoplasty is applied to the defect remained from removing the scar. Methods:. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study performed on 33 patients who underwent reduction rhinoplasty from 2013 to 2018 due to scars on the dorsal nasal skin. Five sets of standards, criteria, and questionnaires were used to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes, scars, and nasal function. These included the Cakir concept, visual analogue scale, patient reported outcome measurement, Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, and sino-nasal outcome test-22. Results:. According to the surface polygon concept, or Cakir concept, the number of affected polygons due to scars decreased in all included patients (P < 0.05). In addition, constant improvement in patients’ satisfaction, based on patient reported outcome measurement (P < 0.001) and visual analogue scale (P ≤ 0.05), as well as physicians’ satisfaction, based on Stony Brook scar evaluation scale, were determined. Furthermore, evaluating the patients’ breathing, based on sino-nasal outcome test-22 criteria (P < 0.09), indicated no adverse effects. Conclusion:. Excision of scars from dorsal nasal skin and conducting rhinoplasty surgery from the same access can be considered an option for reconstructing nasal scars.
format article
author Mahmood Omranifard, MD
Neda Zare, MD
Maryam Mahabadi, MD
author_facet Mahmood Omranifard, MD
Neda Zare, MD
Maryam Mahabadi, MD
author_sort Mahmood Omranifard, MD
title Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
title_short Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
title_full Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
title_fullStr Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Excision of Dorsal Nasal Scars and Reduction Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
title_sort concurrent excision of dorsal nasal scars and reduction rhinoplasty: a retrospective cross-sectional study
publisher Wolters Kluwer
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9bd451e18fd74d7aa84da879115b20bc
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoodomranifardmd concurrentexcisionofdorsalnasalscarsandreductionrhinoplastyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT nedazaremd concurrentexcisionofdorsalnasalscarsandreductionrhinoplastyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT maryammahabadimd concurrentexcisionofdorsalnasalscarsandreductionrhinoplastyaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718413575191527424