Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease
Vinod Burade,1 Rishit Zalawadia,1 Alpesh Patel,1 Abayomi Ogundele2 1Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Vadodara, Gujarat, India; 2Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USACorrespondence: Abayomi OgundeleSun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USATel +1 (609) 720-5389Email...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9be7161308bd4b1fbd04573111b37454 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Vinod Burade,1 Rishit Zalawadia,1 Alpesh Patel,1 Abayomi Ogundele2 1Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Vadodara, Gujarat, India; 2Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USACorrespondence: Abayomi OgundeleSun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USATel +1 (609) 720-5389Email Abayomi.Ogundele@sunpharma.comIntroduction: Cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% (CsA 0.09% sol) is approved to increase tear production in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. This study evaluated the efficacy of CsA 0.09% sol vs cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (CsA 0.05% eml) vs ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.1% (CsA 0.1% eml) in a NOD mice model.Methods: Mice were randomized and administered placebo, CsA 0.09% sol twice daily, CsA 0.05% eml twice daily, CsA 0.09% sol once daily, or CsA 0.1% eml once daily in the conjunctival sac of both eyes for 60 days. Tear volume was measured with phenol red threads at baseline and 4 hours after treatment every 15 days. On day 58, the corneal surface was observed under a slit-lamp after staining with 3% lissamine green administered into the inferior lateral conjunctival sac. On day 61, mice were euthanized, globes excised, sliced into 4 μm sections in 3 areas per section, and stained. Total number of stained goblet cell/μm was counted, and the sum per eye was averaged. Lacrimal gland tissues were removed and interleukin (IL) 1-β cytokine levels estimated.Results: Groups comprised 11 mice each, including an untreated normal and untreated diseased control group (7 groups total). CsA 0.09% sol twice daily significantly increased tear volume on day 30, 45, and 60 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P< 0.05, < 0.001, < 0.001, respectively) and vs CsA 0.1% eml on day 60 (P< 0.05); CsA 0.09% sol once daily significantly increased tear volume on day 45 vs CsA 0.05% eml (P< 0.05). Goblet cell density significantly increased with CsA 0.09% sol twice daily vs placebo and NOD control (P< 0.01 both). There was no significant difference in corneal staining and IL-1β levels with CsA 0.09% sol.Conclusion: Sixty-day treatment with CsA 0.09% sol showed comparatively improved preclinical results vs CsA 0.05% eml and CsA 0.1% eml.Keywords: cyclosporine A, goblet cell density, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, preclinical, tear production |
|---|