Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics

Abstract Aim of this study was to determine if perioperative hemodynamics have an impact on perioperative infarct volume and patients’ prognosis. 201 cases with surgery for a newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data and perioperative hemodynamic paramete...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefanie Bette, Benedikt Wiestler, Felicitas Wiedenmann, Johannes Kaesmacher, Martin Bretschneider, Melanie Barz, Thomas Huber, Yu-Mi Ryang, Eberhard Kochs, Claus Zimmer, Bernhard Meyer, Tobias Boeckh-Behrens, Jan S. Kirschke, Jens Gempt
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9bef38b9ba1b46288feda9231d627da7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9bef38b9ba1b46288feda9231d627da7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9bef38b9ba1b46288feda9231d627da72021-12-02T12:30:43ZSafe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics10.1038/s41598-017-05767-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9bef38b9ba1b46288feda9231d627da72017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05767-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Aim of this study was to determine if perioperative hemodynamics have an impact on perioperative infarct volume and patients’ prognosis. 201 cases with surgery for a newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data and perioperative hemodynamic parameters, blood tests and time of surgery were recorded. Postoperative infarct volume was quantitatively assessed by semiautomatic segmentation. Mean diastolic blood pressure (dBP) during surgery (rho −0.239, 95% CI −0.11 – −0.367, p = 0.017), liquid balance (rho 0.236, 95% CI 0.1–0.373, p = 0.017) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during surgery (rho −0.206, 95% CI −0.07 – −0.34, p = 0.041) showed significant correlation to infarct volume. A rank regression model including also age and recurrent surgery as possible confounders revealed mean intraoperative dBP, liquid balance and length of surgery as independent factors for infarct volume. Univariate survival analysis showed mean intraoperative dBP and MAP as significant prognostic factors, length of surgery also remained as significant prognostic factor in a multivariate model. Perioperative close anesthesiologic monitoring of blood pressure and liquid balance is of high significance during brain tumor surgery and should be performed to prevent or minimize perioperative infarctions and to prolong survival.Stefanie BetteBenedikt WiestlerFelicitas WiedenmannJohannes KaesmacherMartin BretschneiderMelanie BarzThomas HuberYu-Mi RyangEberhard KochsClaus ZimmerBernhard MeyerTobias Boeckh-BehrensJan S. KirschkeJens GemptNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Stefanie Bette
Benedikt Wiestler
Felicitas Wiedenmann
Johannes Kaesmacher
Martin Bretschneider
Melanie Barz
Thomas Huber
Yu-Mi Ryang
Eberhard Kochs
Claus Zimmer
Bernhard Meyer
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Jan S. Kirschke
Jens Gempt
Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
description Abstract Aim of this study was to determine if perioperative hemodynamics have an impact on perioperative infarct volume and patients’ prognosis. 201 cases with surgery for a newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical data and perioperative hemodynamic parameters, blood tests and time of surgery were recorded. Postoperative infarct volume was quantitatively assessed by semiautomatic segmentation. Mean diastolic blood pressure (dBP) during surgery (rho −0.239, 95% CI −0.11 – −0.367, p = 0.017), liquid balance (rho 0.236, 95% CI 0.1–0.373, p = 0.017) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during surgery (rho −0.206, 95% CI −0.07 – −0.34, p = 0.041) showed significant correlation to infarct volume. A rank regression model including also age and recurrent surgery as possible confounders revealed mean intraoperative dBP, liquid balance and length of surgery as independent factors for infarct volume. Univariate survival analysis showed mean intraoperative dBP and MAP as significant prognostic factors, length of surgery also remained as significant prognostic factor in a multivariate model. Perioperative close anesthesiologic monitoring of blood pressure and liquid balance is of high significance during brain tumor surgery and should be performed to prevent or minimize perioperative infarctions and to prolong survival.
format article
author Stefanie Bette
Benedikt Wiestler
Felicitas Wiedenmann
Johannes Kaesmacher
Martin Bretschneider
Melanie Barz
Thomas Huber
Yu-Mi Ryang
Eberhard Kochs
Claus Zimmer
Bernhard Meyer
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Jan S. Kirschke
Jens Gempt
author_facet Stefanie Bette
Benedikt Wiestler
Felicitas Wiedenmann
Johannes Kaesmacher
Martin Bretschneider
Melanie Barz
Thomas Huber
Yu-Mi Ryang
Eberhard Kochs
Claus Zimmer
Bernhard Meyer
Tobias Boeckh-Behrens
Jan S. Kirschke
Jens Gempt
author_sort Stefanie Bette
title Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
title_short Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
title_full Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
title_fullStr Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
title_full_unstemmed Safe Brain Tumor Resection Does not Depend on Surgery Alone - Role of Hemodynamics
title_sort safe brain tumor resection does not depend on surgery alone - role of hemodynamics
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/9bef38b9ba1b46288feda9231d627da7
work_keys_str_mv AT stefaniebette safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT benediktwiestler safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT felicitaswiedenmann safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT johanneskaesmacher safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT martinbretschneider safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT melaniebarz safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT thomashuber safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT yumiryang safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT eberhardkochs safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT clauszimmer safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT bernhardmeyer safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT tobiasboeckhbehrens safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT janskirschke safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
AT jensgempt safebraintumorresectiondoesnotdependonsurgeryaloneroleofhemodynamics
_version_ 1718394349729873920