Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer

Abstract To compare the clinical results of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy, and provide clinical evidence for choosing a better ostomy method. We retrospectively collected data of 118 patients with rectal cancer who underwent l...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hui Ye, Shujuan Huang, Jie Yu, Qichang Zhou, Changlei Xi, Longlei Cao, Peiyun Wang, Jie Shen, Zhilin Gong
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9bf7291df5e545468689ebf42239f63e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9bf7291df5e545468689ebf42239f63e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9bf7291df5e545468689ebf42239f63e2021-12-02T16:55:46ZComparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer10.1038/s41598-021-88674-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9bf7291df5e545468689ebf42239f63e2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88674-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract To compare the clinical results of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy, and provide clinical evidence for choosing a better ostomy method. We retrospectively collected data of 118 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection and loop ileostomy. To investigate the patients characteristics, postoperative stoma-related complications and the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags. The differences of these indicators between the two groups of patients who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy were compared. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of the skin bridge loop ileostomy group was lower than that of the traditional ileostomy loop group (P < 0.05). The skin bridge group had a lower Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth (DET) score and incidence of mucocutaneous separation than the traditional group at the 1st and 2nd weeks after operation (P < 0.05). The average number of weekly exchanged ostomy bags was significantly less in the skin bridge group than in the traditional group within 4 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). Our experience demonstrates that the skin bridge loop ileostomy may significantly reduce early postoperative stoma-related complications, the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags and patients’ medical costs after discharge.Hui YeShujuan HuangJie YuQichang ZhouChanglei XiLonglei CaoPeiyun WangJie ShenZhilin GongNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Hui Ye Shujuan Huang Jie Yu Qichang Zhou Changlei Xi Longlei Cao Peiyun Wang Jie Shen Zhilin Gong Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
description	Abstract To compare the clinical results of patients with low rectal cancer who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy, and provide clinical evidence for choosing a better ostomy method. We retrospectively collected data of 118 patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection and loop ileostomy. To investigate the patients characteristics, postoperative stoma-related complications and the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags. The differences of these indicators between the two groups of patients who underwent skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy were compared. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of the skin bridge loop ileostomy group was lower than that of the traditional ileostomy loop group (P < 0.05). The skin bridge group had a lower Discoloration, Erosion, Tissue overgrowth (DET) score and incidence of mucocutaneous separation than the traditional group at the 1st and 2nd weeks after operation (P < 0.05). The average number of weekly exchanged ostomy bags was significantly less in the skin bridge group than in the traditional group within 4 weeks after surgery (P < 0.05). Our experience demonstrates that the skin bridge loop ileostomy may significantly reduce early postoperative stoma-related complications, the frequency of exchanged ostomy bags and patients’ medical costs after discharge.
format	article
author	Hui Ye Shujuan Huang Jie Yu Qichang Zhou Changlei Xi Longlei Cao Peiyun Wang Jie Shen Zhilin Gong
author_facet	Hui Ye Shujuan Huang Jie Yu Qichang Zhou Changlei Xi Longlei Cao Peiyun Wang Jie Shen Zhilin Gong
author_sort	Hui Ye
title	Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
title_short	Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
title_full	Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
title_fullStr	Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
title_sort	comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9bf7291df5e545468689ebf42239f63e
work_keys_str_mv	AT huiye comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT shujuanhuang comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT jieyu comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT qichangzhou comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT changleixi comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT longleicao comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT peiyunwang comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT jieshen comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer AT zhilingong comparisonoftheclinicaloutcomesofskinbridgeloopileostomyandtraditionalloopileostomyinpatientswithlowrectalcancer
_version_	1718382815538577408

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer

Ejemplares similares