Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement

Non-firearm abdominal impalement is a rare presentation of pediatric trauma and presents unique challenges. Here, we present the case of a 13-year-old girl who sustained transabdominal impalement of a tree branch from a sledding accident in which she was being towed behind an ATV. Complicating her c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caroline M. Godfrey, Harold N. Lovvorn, III, Amber Greeno, Eunice Huang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9bf8a4b76fa34599b6e4f105b090678b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9bf8a4b76fa34599b6e4f105b090678b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9bf8a4b76fa34599b6e4f105b090678b2021-11-22T04:25:10ZSituational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement2213-576610.1016/j.epsc.2021.102130https://doaj.org/article/9bf8a4b76fa34599b6e4f105b090678b2022-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213576621003511https://doaj.org/toc/2213-5766Non-firearm abdominal impalement is a rare presentation of pediatric trauma and presents unique challenges. Here, we present the case of a 13-year-old girl who sustained transabdominal impalement of a tree branch from a sledding accident in which she was being towed behind an ATV. Complicating her care was a concurrent, city-wide state of emergency in which internet and cellular communications were impaired after the bombing of a communication building. To characterize trajectory, computer tomographic (CT) scan imaging showed the branch traversed the right retroperitoneum, obstructing the ureter and inferior vena cava, passed adjacent to the inferior wall of the 4th portion of the duodenum, perforated the stomach, and exited the peritoneum through the left abdominal wall musculature. Laparotomy identified lacerations to the anterior and posterior gastric walls, a duodenal laceration, and significant debris throughout the abdomen. Three visceral defects were closed primarily. A contrast study on POD5 confirmed integrity of the repairs. She recovered well and was discharged on POD13. This case highlights the importance of evaluating patient-specific mechanism of injury (“look at”), assessing patients in real time when provider communications are limited due to any disaster (“look up”), and sharing with the community critical public health lessons (“look around”).Caroline M. GodfreyHarold N. Lovvorn, IIIAmber GreenoEunice HuangElsevierarticlePediatric traumaImpalementSledding accidentDisaster planningPediatricsRJ1-570SurgeryRD1-811ENJournal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports, Vol 76, Iss , Pp 102130- (2022)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Pediatric trauma
Impalement
Sledding accident
Disaster planning
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Pediatric trauma
Impalement
Sledding accident
Disaster planning
Pediatrics
RJ1-570
Surgery
RD1-811
Caroline M. Godfrey
Harold N. Lovvorn, III
Amber Greeno
Eunice Huang
Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
description Non-firearm abdominal impalement is a rare presentation of pediatric trauma and presents unique challenges. Here, we present the case of a 13-year-old girl who sustained transabdominal impalement of a tree branch from a sledding accident in which she was being towed behind an ATV. Complicating her care was a concurrent, city-wide state of emergency in which internet and cellular communications were impaired after the bombing of a communication building. To characterize trajectory, computer tomographic (CT) scan imaging showed the branch traversed the right retroperitoneum, obstructing the ureter and inferior vena cava, passed adjacent to the inferior wall of the 4th portion of the duodenum, perforated the stomach, and exited the peritoneum through the left abdominal wall musculature. Laparotomy identified lacerations to the anterior and posterior gastric walls, a duodenal laceration, and significant debris throughout the abdomen. Three visceral defects were closed primarily. A contrast study on POD5 confirmed integrity of the repairs. She recovered well and was discharged on POD13. This case highlights the importance of evaluating patient-specific mechanism of injury (“look at”), assessing patients in real time when provider communications are limited due to any disaster (“look up”), and sharing with the community critical public health lessons (“look around”).
format article
author Caroline M. Godfrey
Harold N. Lovvorn, III
Amber Greeno
Eunice Huang
author_facet Caroline M. Godfrey
Harold N. Lovvorn, III
Amber Greeno
Eunice Huang
author_sort Caroline M. Godfrey
title Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
title_short Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
title_full Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
title_fullStr Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
title_full_unstemmed Situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
title_sort situational awareness in the management of pediatric abdominal impalement
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://doaj.org/article/9bf8a4b76fa34599b6e4f105b090678b
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinemgodfrey situationalawarenessinthemanagementofpediatricabdominalimpalement
AT haroldnlovvorniii situationalawarenessinthemanagementofpediatricabdominalimpalement
AT ambergreeno situationalawarenessinthemanagementofpediatricabdominalimpalement
AT eunicehuang situationalawarenessinthemanagementofpediatricabdominalimpalement
_version_ 1718418238766841856