The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia

Abstract Leukapheresis is used for the mechanical removal of leukaemic cells in hyperleukocytosis. However, the effectiveness of leukapheresis remains unclear due to selection and confounding factors in the cohorts. We compared the effectiveness of leukapheresis among the subgroups according to eith...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howon Lee, Silvia Park, Jae-Ho Yoon, Byung-Sik Cho, Hee-Je Kim, Seok Lee, Dong-Wook Kim, Nack-Gyun Chung, Bin Cho, Kyoung Bo Kim, Jaeeun Yoo, Dong Wook Jekarl, Hyojin Chae, Jihyang Lim, Myungshin Kim, Eun-Jee Oh, Yonggoo Kim
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9c06f37174724cd5a9469db5bc02ff35
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9c06f37174724cd5a9469db5bc02ff35
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9c06f37174724cd5a9469db5bc02ff352021-12-02T11:39:39ZThe factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia10.1038/s41598-021-85918-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9c06f37174724cd5a9469db5bc02ff352021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85918-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Leukapheresis is used for the mechanical removal of leukaemic cells in hyperleukocytosis. However, the effectiveness of leukapheresis remains unclear due to selection and confounding factors in the cohorts. We compared the effectiveness of leukapheresis among the subgroups according to either the 2016 World Health Organization classification or the number of cytogenetic abnormalities with a retrospective, single-centre study from January 2009 to December 2018. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML, n = 212) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL, n = 97) were included. The 30-day survival rates (95% confidence interval, 95% CI) for AML and ALL were 86.3% (81.6–90.9%) and 94.8% (90.3–99.2%), respectively. For AML, ‘primary AML with myelodysplasia-related changes’ and ‘AML with biallelic mutation of CEBPA’ showed better 30-day survival outcomes (P = 0.026) than the other subgroups. A higher platelet count after leukapheresis was associated with better 30-day survival in AML patients (P = 0.029). A decrease in blast percentage count after leukapheresis was associated with better 30-day survival in ALL patients (P = 0.034). Our study suggested that prophylactic platelet transfusion to raise the platelet count to 50 × 109/L or greater might improve clinical outcome in AML patients undergoing leukapheresis.Howon LeeSilvia ParkJae-Ho YoonByung-Sik ChoHee-Je KimSeok LeeDong-Wook KimNack-Gyun ChungBin ChoKyoung Bo KimJaeeun YooDong Wook JekarlHyojin ChaeJihyang LimMyungshin KimEun-Jee OhYonggoo KimNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Howon Lee
Silvia Park
Jae-Ho Yoon
Byung-Sik Cho
Hee-Je Kim
Seok Lee
Dong-Wook Kim
Nack-Gyun Chung
Bin Cho
Kyoung Bo Kim
Jaeeun Yoo
Dong Wook Jekarl
Hyojin Chae
Jihyang Lim
Myungshin Kim
Eun-Jee Oh
Yonggoo Kim
The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
description Abstract Leukapheresis is used for the mechanical removal of leukaemic cells in hyperleukocytosis. However, the effectiveness of leukapheresis remains unclear due to selection and confounding factors in the cohorts. We compared the effectiveness of leukapheresis among the subgroups according to either the 2016 World Health Organization classification or the number of cytogenetic abnormalities with a retrospective, single-centre study from January 2009 to December 2018. Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML, n = 212) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL, n = 97) were included. The 30-day survival rates (95% confidence interval, 95% CI) for AML and ALL were 86.3% (81.6–90.9%) and 94.8% (90.3–99.2%), respectively. For AML, ‘primary AML with myelodysplasia-related changes’ and ‘AML with biallelic mutation of CEBPA’ showed better 30-day survival outcomes (P = 0.026) than the other subgroups. A higher platelet count after leukapheresis was associated with better 30-day survival in AML patients (P = 0.029). A decrease in blast percentage count after leukapheresis was associated with better 30-day survival in ALL patients (P = 0.034). Our study suggested that prophylactic platelet transfusion to raise the platelet count to 50 × 109/L or greater might improve clinical outcome in AML patients undergoing leukapheresis.
format article
author Howon Lee
Silvia Park
Jae-Ho Yoon
Byung-Sik Cho
Hee-Je Kim
Seok Lee
Dong-Wook Kim
Nack-Gyun Chung
Bin Cho
Kyoung Bo Kim
Jaeeun Yoo
Dong Wook Jekarl
Hyojin Chae
Jihyang Lim
Myungshin Kim
Eun-Jee Oh
Yonggoo Kim
author_facet Howon Lee
Silvia Park
Jae-Ho Yoon
Byung-Sik Cho
Hee-Je Kim
Seok Lee
Dong-Wook Kim
Nack-Gyun Chung
Bin Cho
Kyoung Bo Kim
Jaeeun Yoo
Dong Wook Jekarl
Hyojin Chae
Jihyang Lim
Myungshin Kim
Eun-Jee Oh
Yonggoo Kim
author_sort Howon Lee
title The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
title_short The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
title_full The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
title_fullStr The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
title_full_unstemmed The factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
title_sort factors influencing clinical outcomes after leukapheresis in acute leukaemia
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9c06f37174724cd5a9469db5bc02ff35
work_keys_str_mv AT howonlee thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT silviapark thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jaehoyoon thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT byungsikcho thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT heejekim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT seoklee thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT dongwookkim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT nackgyunchung thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT bincho thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT kyoungbokim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jaeeunyoo thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT dongwookjekarl thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT hyojinchae thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jihyanglim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT myungshinkim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT eunjeeoh thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT yonggookim thefactorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT howonlee factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT silviapark factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jaehoyoon factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT byungsikcho factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT heejekim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT seoklee factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT dongwookkim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT nackgyunchung factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT bincho factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT kyoungbokim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jaeeunyoo factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT dongwookjekarl factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT hyojinchae factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT jihyanglim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT myungshinkim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT eunjeeoh factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
AT yonggookim factorsinfluencingclinicaloutcomesafterleukapheresisinacuteleukaemia
_version_ 1718395715521085440