Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations

Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender iden...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Anton V. Dyachenko, Alexey Y. Perekhov, Victor A. Soldatkin, Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Eco-Vector 2021
Materias:	gender identity disorders gender dysphoria transsexualism transgender gender reassignment Psychiatry RC435-571 Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b7168
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b7168
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b71682021-11-30T16:05:53ZGender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations2712-76722713-291910.17816/CP68https://doaj.org/article/9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b71682021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://consortium-psy.com/jour/article/viewFile/68/pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2712-7672https://doaj.org/toc/2713-2919Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented. Conclusion. Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.Anton V. DyachenkoAlexey Y. PerekhovVictor A. SoldatkinOlga A. BukhanovskayaEco-Vectorarticlegender identity disordersgender dysphoriatranssexualismtransgendergender reassignmentPsychiatryRC435-571PsychologyBF1-990ENRUConsortium Psychiatricum, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 54-64 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	gender identity disorders gender dysphoria transsexualism transgender gender reassignment Psychiatry RC435-571 Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	gender identity disorders gender dysphoria transsexualism transgender gender reassignment Psychiatry RC435-571 Psychology BF1-990 Anton V. Dyachenko Alexey Y. Perekhov Victor A. Soldatkin Olga A. Bukhanovskaya Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
description	Introduction. This article presents a review of current concepts of gender identity under normal and pathological conditions. Aim. To analyse the impact of the medical and social paradigm shift for clinical practice. Results and discussion. The modern academic literature devoted to gender identity disorders is characterized by a variety of terminology, a shift in emphasis from clinical judgement to a socially beneficial normocentric approach and a relatively few advanced, evidence-based research. There is also a lack of evidence for the gender theory underlying the new approach, which raises serious doubts about the validity of the medical and social paradigm revision. In the same time, the position of Russian psychiatrists remains to be more clinically oriented. Conclusion. Patients who declare the desire to reassign their gender have to be assessed by psychiatrists for differential diagnosis to exclude a mental disorder. In such cases, the destigmatization of mental disorders is more critical than the depathologization of gender identity disorders.
format	article
author	Anton V. Dyachenko Alexey Y. Perekhov Victor A. Soldatkin Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
author_facet	Anton V. Dyachenko Alexey Y. Perekhov Victor A. Soldatkin Olga A. Bukhanovskaya
author_sort	Anton V. Dyachenko
title	Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_short	Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_full	Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_fullStr	Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_full_unstemmed	Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations
title_sort	gender identity disorders: current medical and social paradigm and the icd-11 innovations
publisher	Eco-Vector
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9c0b021647284a74868c24b6bf8b7168
work_keys_str_mv	AT antonvdyachenko genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations AT alexeyyperekhov genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations AT victorasoldatkin genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations AT olgaabukhanovskaya genderidentitydisorderscurrentmedicalandsocialparadigmandtheicd11innovations
_version_	1718406460996583424

Gender Identity Disorders: Current Medical and Social Paradigm and the ICD-11 Innovations

Ejemplares similares