Explicit size distributions of failure cascades redefine systemic risk on finite networks
Abstract How big is the risk that a few initial failures of nodes in a network amplify to large cascades that span a substantial share of all nodes? Predicting the final cascade size is critical to ensure the functioning of a system as a whole. Yet, this task is hampered by uncertain and missing inf...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | EN |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/9c4da604ba06445e9c904b4ac1f9aecd |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract How big is the risk that a few initial failures of nodes in a network amplify to large cascades that span a substantial share of all nodes? Predicting the final cascade size is critical to ensure the functioning of a system as a whole. Yet, this task is hampered by uncertain and missing information. In infinitely large networks, the average cascade size can often be estimated by approaches building on local tree and mean field approximations. Yet, as we demonstrate, in finite networks, this average does not need to be a likely outcome. Instead, we find broad and even bimodal cascade size distributions. This phenomenon persists for system sizes up to 107 and different cascade models, i.e. it is relevant for most real systems. To show this, we derive explicit closed-form solutions for the full probability distribution of the final cascade size. We focus on two topological limit cases, the complete network representing a dense network with a very narrow degree distribution, and the star network representing a sparse network with a inhomogeneous degree distribution. Those topologies are of great interest, as they either minimize or maximize the average cascade size and are common motifs in many real world networks. |
|---|