THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.

The aim of this study is to remark the principals’ opinions about the use of authority, delegation of authority and seize of authority. In this research, holistic single case design, one of the qualitative research methods, has been used. The study group of this research has been selected, in appli...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖK, Kemal KAYIKÇI, Serdar ÖZÇETİN, Ramazan GÖK
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR TR
Publicado:	Fırat University 2021
Materias:	authority delegation of authority seize of authority case study content analysis Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9c9c956d6cdb444b9ee733150c08bef4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9c9c956d6cdb444b9ee733150c08bef4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9c9c956d6cdb444b9ee733150c08bef42021-11-24T09:20:33ZTHE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.2148-416310.29228/JASSS.48936https://doaj.org/article/9c9c956d6cdb444b9ee733150c08bef42021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=51557731-ad18-44b0-9676-236e969052f1.pdf&key=48936https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The aim of this study is to remark the principals’ opinions about the use of authority, delegation of authority and seize of authority. In this research, holistic single case design, one of the qualitative research methods, has been used. The study group of this research has been selected, in appliance with the integrated single case pattern, by using the maximum diversity sampling method and voluntary basis. School principals of 9 schools in the center municipalities of the city of Antalya have been contacted by using semi structured personal interview forms. For the analysis of the collected data, content analysis has been used. NVivo 9.2 package program was used to encode and categorize the data. The results of the research show that the principals’ conceive their authorities as insufficient and in some cases, in order not to witness resistance, instead of using their authority they use their relations. All of the 9 principals stated that, if they have the power of selecting personnel, creating funds and the freedom of using their funds for the school, they would make the school a more efficient place. In some instances, they experienced difficulties in using their authorities and they were intruded by the intervention of their superiors, politicians and unionists. It has been found out that delegation of authority is perceived as a necessary practice as it positively affects teamwork and motivates people. In the delegation of authority, fairness, merit, specialization and written announcement appear to be the main principles. It has been observed that the most important factor that makes the transfer of authority difficult is the distrust of subordinates, and school principals trust the vice principals they recommend more among their subordinates to whom they will delegate authority. The major factors that make the delegation of authority difficult are found to be; the distrust to the subordinates, the regulations not being clear and the will of holding power.Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖKKemal KAYIKÇISerdar ÖZÇETİNRamazan GÖKFırat Universityarticleauthoritydelegation of authorityseize of authoritycase studycontent analysisSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 14, Iss 84, Pp 37-55 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR TR
topic	authority delegation of authority seize of authority case study content analysis Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	authority delegation of authority seize of authority case study content analysis Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖK Kemal KAYIKÇI Serdar ÖZÇETİN Ramazan GÖK THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
description	The aim of this study is to remark the principals’ opinions about the use of authority, delegation of authority and seize of authority. In this research, holistic single case design, one of the qualitative research methods, has been used. The study group of this research has been selected, in appliance with the integrated single case pattern, by using the maximum diversity sampling method and voluntary basis. School principals of 9 schools in the center municipalities of the city of Antalya have been contacted by using semi structured personal interview forms. For the analysis of the collected data, content analysis has been used. NVivo 9.2 package program was used to encode and categorize the data. The results of the research show that the principals’ conceive their authorities as insufficient and in some cases, in order not to witness resistance, instead of using their authority they use their relations. All of the 9 principals stated that, if they have the power of selecting personnel, creating funds and the freedom of using their funds for the school, they would make the school a more efficient place. In some instances, they experienced difficulties in using their authorities and they were intruded by the intervention of their superiors, politicians and unionists. It has been found out that delegation of authority is perceived as a necessary practice as it positively affects teamwork and motivates people. In the delegation of authority, fairness, merit, specialization and written announcement appear to be the main principles. It has been observed that the most important factor that makes the transfer of authority difficult is the distrust of subordinates, and school principals trust the vice principals they recommend more among their subordinates to whom they will delegate authority. The major factors that make the delegation of authority difficult are found to be; the distrust to the subordinates, the regulations not being clear and the will of holding power.
format	article
author	Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖK Kemal KAYIKÇI Serdar ÖZÇETİN Ramazan GÖK
author_facet	Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖK Kemal KAYIKÇI Serdar ÖZÇETİN Ramazan GÖK
author_sort	Ebru Burcu ÇİMİLİ GÖK
title	THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
title_short	THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
title_full	THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
title_fullStr	THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
title_full_unstemmed	THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.
title_sort	principals’ opinions about the use of authority, delegation of authority and seize of authority.
publisher	Fırat University
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9c9c956d6cdb444b9ee733150c08bef4
work_keys_str_mv	AT ebruburcucimiligok theprincipalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT kemalkayikci theprincipalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT serdarozcetin theprincipalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT ramazangok theprincipalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT ebruburcucimiligok principalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT kemalkayikci principalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT serdarozcetin principalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority AT ramazangok principalsopinionsabouttheuseofauthoritydelegationofauthorityandseizeofauthority
_version_	1718415751131430912

THE PRINCIPALS’ OPINIONS ABOUT THE USE OF AUTHORITY, DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY AND SEIZE OF AUTHORITY.

Ejemplares similares