Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?

Background: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomohiro Fujiwara, Yusuke Tsuda, Jonathan Stevenson, Michael Parry, Lee Jeys
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f95
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f95
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f952021-11-12T04:32:32ZExtra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?2212-137410.1016/j.jbo.2021.100401https://doaj.org/article/9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f952021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137421000567https://doaj.org/toc/2212-1374Background: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Methods: We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54). Results: There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed. Conclusion: Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.Tomohiro FujiwaraYusuke TsudaJonathan StevensonMichael ParryLee JeysElsevierarticleSarcomaPelvisExtra-articular resectionIntra-articular resectionHip jointDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENJournal of Bone Oncology, Vol 31, Iss , Pp 100401- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Sarcoma
Pelvis
Extra-articular resection
Intra-articular resection
Hip joint
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle Sarcoma
Pelvis
Extra-articular resection
Intra-articular resection
Hip joint
Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
description Background: While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR). Methods: We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54). Results: There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed. Conclusion: Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.
format article
author Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
author_facet Tomohiro Fujiwara
Yusuke Tsuda
Jonathan Stevenson
Michael Parry
Lee Jeys
author_sort Tomohiro Fujiwara
title Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_short Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_full Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_fullStr Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_full_unstemmed Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
title_sort extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9cd0601092ff4fe0ac810ae9e8ca1f95
work_keys_str_mv AT tomohirofujiwara extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT yusuketsuda extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT jonathanstevenson extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT michaelparry extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
AT leejeys extraarticularresectionofthehipjointforpelvicsarcomasarethereanyoncologicalandfunctionalriskscomparedwithintraarticularresection
_version_ 1718431305729835008