Social presence within the community of inquiry framework

The role of social presence as defined by the community of inquiry (CoI) framework is critiqued through a review of recent literature. Evidence is presented that questions the actual extent of knowledge co-construction that occurs in most higher education settings and therefore challenges the frame...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: David Annand
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9cf11d91ce7f4c698d6cbbb522049d32
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9cf11d91ce7f4c698d6cbbb522049d32
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9cf11d91ce7f4c698d6cbbb522049d322021-12-02T19:20:31ZSocial presence within the community of inquiry framework10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.9241492-3831https://doaj.org/article/9cf11d91ce7f4c698d6cbbb522049d322011-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/924https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831 The role of social presence as defined by the community of inquiry (CoI) framework is critiqued through a review of recent literature. Evidence is presented that questions the actual extent of knowledge co-construction that occurs in most higher education settings and therefore challenges the framework’s underlying assumption of the need for sustained, contiguous, two-way communication in higher-level online learning environments. The CoI framework has evolved from the description of a learning process within a social constructivist paradigm to an empirically testable construct in an objectivist paradigm. Related research results indicate that social presence does not impact cognitive presence in a meaningful way and that best teaching practices suggested by CoI-based studies are informed by objectivist, cognitively oriented learning theories. These suggest that higher-order cognition may be achieved through wide and varied combinations of learner–teacher, learner–content, and learner–learner interaction. Controlled studies can and should be undertaken to compare learning outcomes using sustained, contiguous, two-way communication to other learning models. To facilitate this, subcategories of social and teaching presences need to be revamped and analysis adjusted to separate processes that support explicitly group-based learning activities from those used by individual students. David AnnandAthabasca University Pressarticleonline learningcommunities of inquirydistance educationconstructivismobjectivismcohort-based learningSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 12, Iss 5 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic online learning
communities of inquiry
distance education
constructivism
objectivism
cohort-based learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle online learning
communities of inquiry
distance education
constructivism
objectivism
cohort-based learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
David Annand
Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
description The role of social presence as defined by the community of inquiry (CoI) framework is critiqued through a review of recent literature. Evidence is presented that questions the actual extent of knowledge co-construction that occurs in most higher education settings and therefore challenges the framework’s underlying assumption of the need for sustained, contiguous, two-way communication in higher-level online learning environments. The CoI framework has evolved from the description of a learning process within a social constructivist paradigm to an empirically testable construct in an objectivist paradigm. Related research results indicate that social presence does not impact cognitive presence in a meaningful way and that best teaching practices suggested by CoI-based studies are informed by objectivist, cognitively oriented learning theories. These suggest that higher-order cognition may be achieved through wide and varied combinations of learner–teacher, learner–content, and learner–learner interaction. Controlled studies can and should be undertaken to compare learning outcomes using sustained, contiguous, two-way communication to other learning models. To facilitate this, subcategories of social and teaching presences need to be revamped and analysis adjusted to separate processes that support explicitly group-based learning activities from those used by individual students.
format article
author David Annand
author_facet David Annand
author_sort David Annand
title Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
title_short Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
title_full Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
title_fullStr Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
title_full_unstemmed Social presence within the community of inquiry framework
title_sort social presence within the community of inquiry framework
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/9cf11d91ce7f4c698d6cbbb522049d32
work_keys_str_mv AT davidannand socialpresencewithinthecommunityofinquiryframework
_version_ 1718376810530471936