The etiology of resilience to disadvantage

Abstract Background Although early life exposure to chronic disadvantage is associated with deleterious outcomes, 40%–60% of exposed youth continue to thrive. To date, little is known about the etiology of these resilient outcomes. Methods The current study examined child twin families living in dis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Alexandra Y. Vazquez, Elizabeth A. Shewark, D. Angus Clark, Kelly L. Klump, Luke W. Hyde, S. Alexandra Burt
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	adversity resilience twins Pediatrics RJ1-570 Psychiatry RC435-571
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9d0dc649596f43518d09d3d082f3d500
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9d0dc649596f43518d09d3d082f3d500
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9d0dc649596f43518d09d3d082f3d5002021-11-23T06:05:44ZThe etiology of resilience to disadvantage2692-938410.1002/jcv2.12033https://doaj.org/article/9d0dc649596f43518d09d3d082f3d5002021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12033https://doaj.org/toc/2692-9384Abstract Background Although early life exposure to chronic disadvantage is associated with deleterious outcomes, 40%–60% of exposed youth continue to thrive. To date, little is known about the etiology of these resilient outcomes. Methods The current study examined child twin families living in disadvantaged contexts (N = 417 pairs) to elucidate the etiology of resilience. We evaluated maternal reports of the Child Behavior Checklist to examine three domains of resilience and general resilience. Results Genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental influences significantly contributed to social resilience (22%, 61%, 17%, respectively) and psychiatric resilience (40%, 28%, 32%, respectively), but academic resilience was influenced only by genetic and nonshared environmental influences (65% and 35%, respectively). These three domains loaded significantly onto a latent resilience factor, with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.34. A common pathway model revealed that the variance common to all three forms of resilience was predominantly explained by genetic and non‐shared environmental influences (50% and 35%, respectively). Conclusions These results support recent conceptualizations of resilience as a multifaceted construct influenced by both genetic and environmental influences, only some of which overlap across the various domains of resilience.Alexandra Y. VazquezElizabeth A. ShewarkD. Angus ClarkKelly L. KlumpLuke W. HydeS. Alexandra BurtWileyarticleadversityresiliencetwinsPediatricsRJ1-570PsychiatryRC435-571ENJCPP Advances, Vol 1, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	adversity resilience twins Pediatrics RJ1-570 Psychiatry RC435-571
spellingShingle	adversity resilience twins Pediatrics RJ1-570 Psychiatry RC435-571 Alexandra Y. Vazquez Elizabeth A. Shewark D. Angus Clark Kelly L. Klump Luke W. Hyde S. Alexandra Burt The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
description	Abstract Background Although early life exposure to chronic disadvantage is associated with deleterious outcomes, 40%–60% of exposed youth continue to thrive. To date, little is known about the etiology of these resilient outcomes. Methods The current study examined child twin families living in disadvantaged contexts (N = 417 pairs) to elucidate the etiology of resilience. We evaluated maternal reports of the Child Behavior Checklist to examine three domains of resilience and general resilience. Results Genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental influences significantly contributed to social resilience (22%, 61%, 17%, respectively) and psychiatric resilience (40%, 28%, 32%, respectively), but academic resilience was influenced only by genetic and nonshared environmental influences (65% and 35%, respectively). These three domains loaded significantly onto a latent resilience factor, with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.34. A common pathway model revealed that the variance common to all three forms of resilience was predominantly explained by genetic and non‐shared environmental influences (50% and 35%, respectively). Conclusions These results support recent conceptualizations of resilience as a multifaceted construct influenced by both genetic and environmental influences, only some of which overlap across the various domains of resilience.
format	article
author	Alexandra Y. Vazquez Elizabeth A. Shewark D. Angus Clark Kelly L. Klump Luke W. Hyde S. Alexandra Burt
author_facet	Alexandra Y. Vazquez Elizabeth A. Shewark D. Angus Clark Kelly L. Klump Luke W. Hyde S. Alexandra Burt
author_sort	Alexandra Y. Vazquez
title	The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
title_short	The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
title_full	The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
title_fullStr	The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
title_full_unstemmed	The etiology of resilience to disadvantage
title_sort	etiology of resilience to disadvantage
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9d0dc649596f43518d09d3d082f3d500
work_keys_str_mv	AT alexandrayvazquez theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT elizabethashewark theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT dangusclark theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT kellylklump theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT lukewhyde theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT salexandraburt theetiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT alexandrayvazquez etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT elizabethashewark etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT dangusclark etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT kellylklump etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT lukewhyde etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage AT salexandraburt etiologyofresiliencetodisadvantage
_version_	1718417336467193856

The etiology of resilience to disadvantage

Ejemplares similares