Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure

Background: Neurodevelopmental studies of childhood adversity often define threatening experiences as those involving harm or the threat of harm. Whether effects differ between experiences involving harm (“physical attack”) versus the threat of harm alone (“threatened violence”) remains underexplore...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott W. Delaney, Andrea P. Cortes Hidalgo, Tonya White, Sebastien Haneuse, Kerry J. Ressler, Henning Tiemeier, Laura D. Kubzansky
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9d19a94f6d5842c7a44d593263f7dcb7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9d19a94f6d5842c7a44d593263f7dcb7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9d19a94f6d5842c7a44d593263f7dcb72021-11-18T04:46:25ZAre all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure1878-929310.1016/j.dcn.2021.101033https://doaj.org/article/9d19a94f6d5842c7a44d593263f7dcb72021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929321001225https://doaj.org/toc/1878-9293Background: Neurodevelopmental studies of childhood adversity often define threatening experiences as those involving harm or the threat of harm. Whether effects differ between experiences involving harm (“physical attack”) versus the threat of harm alone (“threatened violence”) remains underexplored. We hypothesized that while both types of experiences would be associated with smaller preadolescent global and corticolimbic brain volumes, associations with physical attack would be greater. Methods: Generation R Study researchers (the Netherlands) acquired T1-weighted scans from 2905 preadolescent children, computed brain volumes using FreeSurfer, and asked mothers whether their children ever experienced physical attack (n = 202) or threatened violence (n = 335). Using standardized global (cortical, subcortical, white matter) and corticolimbic (amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex) volumes, we fit confounder-adjusted models. Results: Physical attack was associated with smaller global volumes (βcortical=−0.14; 95% CI: −0.26, −0.02); βwhite matter= −0.16; 95% CI: − 0.28, − 0.03) and possibly some corticolimbic volumes, e.g., βamygdala/ICV-adjusted= −0.10 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.01). We found no evidence of associations between threatened violence and smaller volumes in any outcome; instead, such estimates were small, highly uncertain, and positive in direction. Conclusions: Experiences of physical attack and threatened violence may have quantitively different neurodevelopmental effects. Thus, differences between types of threatening experiences may be neurodevelopmentally salient.Scott W. DelaneyAndrea P. Cortes HidalgoTonya WhiteSebastien HaneuseKerry J. ResslerHenning TiemeierLaura D. KubzanskyElsevierarticleChild developmentSocial environmentAdverse childhood experiencesExposure to violenceGray matterNeurophysiology and neuropsychologyQP351-495ENDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol 52, Iss , Pp 101033- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Child development
Social environment
Adverse childhood experiences
Exposure to violence
Gray matter
Neurophysiology and neuropsychology
QP351-495
spellingShingle Child development
Social environment
Adverse childhood experiences
Exposure to violence
Gray matter
Neurophysiology and neuropsychology
QP351-495
Scott W. Delaney
Andrea P. Cortes Hidalgo
Tonya White
Sebastien Haneuse
Kerry J. Ressler
Henning Tiemeier
Laura D. Kubzansky
Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
description Background: Neurodevelopmental studies of childhood adversity often define threatening experiences as those involving harm or the threat of harm. Whether effects differ between experiences involving harm (“physical attack”) versus the threat of harm alone (“threatened violence”) remains underexplored. We hypothesized that while both types of experiences would be associated with smaller preadolescent global and corticolimbic brain volumes, associations with physical attack would be greater. Methods: Generation R Study researchers (the Netherlands) acquired T1-weighted scans from 2905 preadolescent children, computed brain volumes using FreeSurfer, and asked mothers whether their children ever experienced physical attack (n = 202) or threatened violence (n = 335). Using standardized global (cortical, subcortical, white matter) and corticolimbic (amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex) volumes, we fit confounder-adjusted models. Results: Physical attack was associated with smaller global volumes (βcortical=−0.14; 95% CI: −0.26, −0.02); βwhite matter= −0.16; 95% CI: − 0.28, − 0.03) and possibly some corticolimbic volumes, e.g., βamygdala/ICV-adjusted= −0.10 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.01). We found no evidence of associations between threatened violence and smaller volumes in any outcome; instead, such estimates were small, highly uncertain, and positive in direction. Conclusions: Experiences of physical attack and threatened violence may have quantitively different neurodevelopmental effects. Thus, differences between types of threatening experiences may be neurodevelopmentally salient.
format article
author Scott W. Delaney
Andrea P. Cortes Hidalgo
Tonya White
Sebastien Haneuse
Kerry J. Ressler
Henning Tiemeier
Laura D. Kubzansky
author_facet Scott W. Delaney
Andrea P. Cortes Hidalgo
Tonya White
Sebastien Haneuse
Kerry J. Ressler
Henning Tiemeier
Laura D. Kubzansky
author_sort Scott W. Delaney
title Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
title_short Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
title_full Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
title_fullStr Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
title_full_unstemmed Are all threats equal? Associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
title_sort are all threats equal? associations of childhood exposure to physical attack versus threatened violence with preadolescent brain structure
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9d19a94f6d5842c7a44d593263f7dcb7
work_keys_str_mv AT scottwdelaney areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT andreapcorteshidalgo areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT tonyawhite areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT sebastienhaneuse areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT kerryjressler areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT henningtiemeier areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
AT lauradkubzansky areallthreatsequalassociationsofchildhoodexposuretophysicalattackversusthreatenedviolencewithpreadolescentbrainstructure
_version_ 1718425056336412672