Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kevin Volf, Liam Kelly, Enrique García Bengoechea, Blathin Casey, Anna Gobis, Jeroen Lakerveld, Joanna Zukowska, Peter Gelius, Sven Messing, Sarah Forberger, Catherine Woods, Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) Consortium
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	F1000 Research Ltd 2021
Materias:	Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9da4532761cb467e88be78e1bc604203
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9da4532761cb467e88be78e1bc604203
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9da4532761cb467e88be78e1bc6042032021-11-08T10:53:56ZPolicy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]2515-482610.12688/hrbopenres.13089.3https://doaj.org/article/9da4532761cb467e88be78e1bc6042032021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/3-62/v3https://doaj.org/toc/2515-4826Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown. The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020).Kevin VolfLiam KellyEnrique García BengoecheaBlathin CaseyAnna GobisJeroen LakerveldJoanna ZukowskaPeter GeliusSven MessingSarah ForbergerCatherine WoodsPolicy Evaluation Network (PEN) ConsortiumF1000 Research LtdarticleMedicineRENHRB Open Research, Vol 3 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R
spellingShingle	Medicine R Kevin Volf Liam Kelly Enrique García Bengoechea Blathin Casey Anna Gobis Jeroen Lakerveld Joanna Zukowska Peter Gelius Sven Messing Sarah Forberger Catherine Woods Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) Consortium Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
description	Introduction: Over 40 million deaths annually are due to noncommunicable diseases, 15 million of these are premature deaths and physical inactivity contributes an estimated 9% to this figure. Global responses have included the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Global Action Plan on Physical Activity (GAPPA). Both point to policy action on physical activity (PA) to address change, yet the impact of policy on PA outcomes is unknown. The protocol described outlines the methodology for systematic literature reviews that will be undertaken by the Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) to address this knowledge gap. Methods: The seven best investments for promotion of population PA identified in the Toronto Charter highlighted seven policy domains (schools, transport, urban design, primary health care systems, public education, community-wide programmes and sport) which will form the basis of these PEN reviews. Seven individual scientific literature searches across six electronic databases will be conducted. Each will use the key concepts of policy, PA, evaluation and a distinct concept for each of the seven policy domains. This will be supplemented with a search of the reference list of included articles. Methodological quality will be assessed and overall effectiveness for each included study will be described according to pre-determined criteria. Conclusions: Each review will provide policy makers with a list of policy statements and corresponding actions which the evidence has determined impact on PA directly or indirectly. By collating the evidence, and demonstrating the depth of the science base which informs these policy recommendations, each review will provide guidance to policymakers to use evidence-based or evidence-informed policies to achieve the 15% relative reduction in physical inactivity as defined by GAPPA. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020156630 (10/07/2020).
format	article
author	Kevin Volf Liam Kelly Enrique García Bengoechea Blathin Casey Anna Gobis Jeroen Lakerveld Joanna Zukowska Peter Gelius Sven Messing Sarah Forberger Catherine Woods Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) Consortium
author_facet	Kevin Volf Liam Kelly Enrique García Bengoechea Blathin Casey Anna Gobis Jeroen Lakerveld Joanna Zukowska Peter Gelius Sven Messing Sarah Forberger Catherine Woods Policy Evaluation Network (PEN) Consortium
author_sort	Kevin Volf
title	Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short	Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full	Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr	Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed	Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort	policy evaluation network (pen): protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher	F1000 Research Ltd
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9da4532761cb467e88be78e1bc604203
work_keys_str_mv	AT kevinvolf policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT liamkelly policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT enriquegarciabengoechea policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT blathincasey policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT annagobis policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT jeroenlakerveld policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT joannazukowska policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT petergelius policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT svenmessing policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT sarahforberger policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT catherinewoods policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved AT policyevaluationnetworkpenconsortium policyevaluationnetworkpenprotocolforsystematicliteraturereviewsexaminingtheevidenceforimpactofpoliciesonphysicalactivityacrosssevendifferentpolicydomainsversion3peerreview2approved
_version_	1718442551127572480

Policy Evaluation Network (PEN): Protocol for systematic literature reviews examining the evidence for impact of policies on physical activity across seven different policy domains [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Ejemplares similares