A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone

This article presents a syntactic analysis of the third subject clitic a in Camponese, a heretofore unstudied Friulian variety. Following Poletto's (2000) map of subject clitics, we argue that it bears [+third person] features, and is, in fact, the spell-out of the functional head Subj°, locate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jan Casalicchio, Vania Masutti
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 2015
Materias:	Syntax Split CP Northern Italian Dialects Friulian Subject Clitics split subject features Romanic languages PC1-5498 Philology. Linguistics P1-1091
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9da78d11a5d54f82bd6fee4282ecf2a5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9da78d11a5d54f82bd6fee4282ecf2a5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9da78d11a5d54f82bd6fee4282ecf2a52021-12-01T12:14:19ZA Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone10.5565/rev/isogloss.152385-4138https://doaj.org/article/9da78d11a5d54f82bd6fee4282ecf2a52015-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistes.uab.cat/isogloss/article/view/15https://doaj.org/toc/2385-4138This article presents a syntactic analysis of the third subject clitic a in Camponese, a heretofore unstudied Friulian variety. Following Poletto's (2000) map of subject clitics, we argue that it bears [+third person] features, and is, in fact, the spell-out of the functional head Subj°, located in the highest projection of TP (following Rizzi & Shlonsky 2007).In the first part of the article, we offer a detailed description of the distribution and syntactic properties of the subject clitic a, identifying its position in relation to the other elements that occur in the CP and TP. In the second part we discuss two proposals put forward to account for split clitics like a-l in the related variety of Forni di Sotto, where a and l are held to be part of a single clitic al (Manzini & Savoia 2009, Calabrese & Pescarini 2014). We show that such an account is incompatible with the case of Campone, where the clitics a and l are clearly separate: l is a [uφ]-clitic (Roberts 2010) and is located lower in the TP than the clitic a. We conclude with an analysis, which proposes the integration of Poletto's (2000) typology with a fifth type, corresponding to the clitic a of CamponeJan CasalicchioVania MasuttiUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaarticleSyntaxSplit CPNorthern Italian DialectsFriulianSubject Cliticssplit subject featuresRomanic languagesPC1-5498Philology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENIsogloss (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Syntax Split CP Northern Italian Dialects Friulian Subject Clitics split subject features Romanic languages PC1-5498 Philology. Linguistics P1-1091
spellingShingle	Syntax Split CP Northern Italian Dialects Friulian Subject Clitics split subject features Romanic languages PC1-5498 Philology. Linguistics P1-1091 Jan Casalicchio Vania Masutti A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
description	This article presents a syntactic analysis of the third subject clitic a in Camponese, a heretofore unstudied Friulian variety. Following Poletto's (2000) map of subject clitics, we argue that it bears [+third person] features, and is, in fact, the spell-out of the functional head Subj°, located in the highest projection of TP (following Rizzi & Shlonsky 2007).In the first part of the article, we offer a detailed description of the distribution and syntactic properties of the subject clitic a, identifying its position in relation to the other elements that occur in the CP and TP. In the second part we discuss two proposals put forward to account for split clitics like a-l in the related variety of Forni di Sotto, where a and l are held to be part of a single clitic al (Manzini & Savoia 2009, Calabrese & Pescarini 2014). We show that such an account is incompatible with the case of Campone, where the clitics a and l are clearly separate: l is a [uφ]-clitic (Roberts 2010) and is located lower in the TP than the clitic a. We conclude with an analysis, which proposes the integration of Poletto's (2000) typology with a fifth type, corresponding to the clitic a of Campone
format	article
author	Jan Casalicchio Vania Masutti
author_facet	Jan Casalicchio Vania Masutti
author_sort	Jan Casalicchio
title	A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
title_short	A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
title_full	A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
title_fullStr	A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
title_full_unstemmed	A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone
title_sort	syntactic analysis of the subject clitic "a" in the friulian variety of campone
publisher	Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/9da78d11a5d54f82bd6fee4282ecf2a5
work_keys_str_mv	AT jancasalicchio asyntacticanalysisofthesubjectcliticainthefriulianvarietyofcampone AT vaniamasutti asyntacticanalysisofthesubjectcliticainthefriulianvarietyofcampone AT jancasalicchio syntacticanalysisofthesubjectcliticainthefriulianvarietyofcampone AT vaniamasutti syntacticanalysisofthesubjectcliticainthefriulianvarietyofcampone
_version_	1718405190562873344

A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone

Ejemplares similares