Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis

The article is devoted to the comparison of plant names of the Finno-Ugric and English languages. The basis for the analysis are the plant names of the Finnish language and Karelian dialects, including the characteristic of the form of any part of the plant. The comparison of these plant names with...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: E. G. Galitsyna
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9dd183fb8d1741f1aa9cdfd00d8a7017
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9dd183fb8d1741f1aa9cdfd00d8a7017
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9dd183fb8d1741f1aa9cdfd00d8a70172021-12-02T07:58:04ZPlant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2018-5-49-59https://doaj.org/article/9dd183fb8d1741f1aa9cdfd00d8a70172018-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/796https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article is devoted to the comparison of plant names of the Finno-Ugric and English languages. The basis for the analysis are the plant names of the Finnish language and Karelian dialects, including the characteristic of the form of any part of the plant. The comparison of these plant names with the names of the same plants in the English language is made. The article analyzes the names of 8 plants, such as bindweed (Convolvulus L.), reedmace (Typha L.), club moss (Lycopodium clavatum L.), marigold (Calendula L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), couch grass (Elytrigia Desv.), fern (fam. Polypodiaceae), fuchsia (Fuchsia L.). In each case, information about the motivation of the plant names is given and nominative features that determine the names are pointed out. According to the presented material, Finno-Ugric and English plant names can be motivated by the form of stems, inflorescences, fruits, shoots, leaves and flowers of plants. Attention is also paid to the etymology of the analyzed lexical units. The author considers the plant names of the English language in the dynamic aspect, indicating the names of the plants in Old, Middle and Modern English. On the basis of the material presented in the paper, conclusions are made about the similarity and difference in the nomination of the same natural objects in typologically different languages.E. G. GalitsynaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlephytonymyfolk names of plantsfinno-ugric languagesenglish languagenominationmotivationonomasticscomparative analysisSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 5, Pp 49-59 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic phytonymy
folk names of plants
finno-ugric languages
english language
nomination
motivation
onomastics
comparative analysis
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle phytonymy
folk names of plants
finno-ugric languages
english language
nomination
motivation
onomastics
comparative analysis
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
E. G. Galitsyna
Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
description The article is devoted to the comparison of plant names of the Finno-Ugric and English languages. The basis for the analysis are the plant names of the Finnish language and Karelian dialects, including the characteristic of the form of any part of the plant. The comparison of these plant names with the names of the same plants in the English language is made. The article analyzes the names of 8 plants, such as bindweed (Convolvulus L.), reedmace (Typha L.), club moss (Lycopodium clavatum L.), marigold (Calendula L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), couch grass (Elytrigia Desv.), fern (fam. Polypodiaceae), fuchsia (Fuchsia L.). In each case, information about the motivation of the plant names is given and nominative features that determine the names are pointed out. According to the presented material, Finno-Ugric and English plant names can be motivated by the form of stems, inflorescences, fruits, shoots, leaves and flowers of plants. Attention is also paid to the etymology of the analyzed lexical units. The author considers the plant names of the English language in the dynamic aspect, indicating the names of the plants in Old, Middle and Modern English. On the basis of the material presented in the paper, conclusions are made about the similarity and difference in the nomination of the same natural objects in typologically different languages.
format article
author E. G. Galitsyna
author_facet E. G. Galitsyna
author_sort E. G. Galitsyna
title Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
title_short Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
title_full Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Plant names of Finno-Ugric Languages Motivated by Plant Parts Form and Their Equivalents in the English language: Comparative Analysis
title_sort plant names of finno-ugric languages motivated by plant parts form and their equivalents in the english language: comparative analysis
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/9dd183fb8d1741f1aa9cdfd00d8a7017
work_keys_str_mv AT eggalitsyna plantnamesoffinnougriclanguagesmotivatedbyplantpartsformandtheirequivalentsintheenglishlanguagecomparativeanalysis
_version_ 1718399001391267840