O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia
The article is divided into three parts. In the first part we commented on the central problematizations about the question of technology in authors of the first generation of Critical Theory – namely in Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse. In the second, we analyze how Jürgen Hab...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | PT |
| Publicado: |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9de86ffc19d14ef8b386e31bea2a90af |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9de86ffc19d14ef8b386e31bea2a90af |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9de86ffc19d14ef8b386e31bea2a90af2021-11-11T15:42:01ZO debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia2177-6229https://doaj.org/article/9de86ffc19d14ef8b386e31bea2a90af2017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93853317014https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229The article is divided into three parts. In the first part we commented on the central problematizations about the question of technology in authors of the first generation of Critical Theory – namely in Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse. In the second, we analyze how Jürgen Habermas, in Technology and Science as ‘Ideology’, written in 1968, makes up a decisive debate about such problematizations, developing new propositions about it, which would result in a re-neutralization of technology. Lastly, in the third part, we present the contemporary position of Andrew Feenberg on the legacy of the aforementioned authors, clearing up their propositions of Critical Theory of Technology.Ednei de GenaroUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articlecritical theorytechnologyhabermasfeenbergcritical theory of technologySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 53, Iss 2, Pp 292-299 (2017) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
PT |
| topic |
critical theory technology habermas feenberg critical theory of technology Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 |
| spellingShingle |
critical theory technology habermas feenberg critical theory of technology Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Ednei de Genaro O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| description |
The article is divided into three parts. In the first part we commented on the central problematizations about the question of technology in authors of the first generation of Critical Theory – namely in Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, and Herbert Marcuse. In the second, we analyze how Jürgen Habermas, in Technology and Science as ‘Ideology’, written in 1968, makes up a decisive debate about such problematizations, developing new propositions about it, which would result in a re-neutralization of technology. Lastly, in the third part, we present the contemporary position of Andrew Feenberg on the legacy of the aforementioned authors, clearing up their propositions of Critical Theory of Technology. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Ednei de Genaro |
| author_facet |
Ednei de Genaro |
| author_sort |
Ednei de Genaro |
| title |
O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| title_short |
O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| title_full |
O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| title_fullStr |
O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
O debate da Teoria Crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| title_sort |
o debate da teoria crítica sobre a tecnologia |
| publisher |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/9de86ffc19d14ef8b386e31bea2a90af |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT edneidegenaro odebatedateoriacriticasobreatecnologia |
| _version_ |
1718434105111085056 |