The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease

Abstract Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korea...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mi Hong Yim, Keun Ho Kim, Bum Ju Lee
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9e043c8082424352953811f4c1b79263
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9e043c8082424352953811f4c1b79263
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9e043c8082424352953811f4c1b792632021-12-02T13:34:51ZThe number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease10.1038/s41598-021-84892-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9e043c8082424352953811f4c1b792632021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84892-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korean population. This cross-sectional study used 1998–2009 data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple binary logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were constructed to analyze the association of PUD with the number of household members. The number of household members was associated with PUD, age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, glucose, location (urban/rural), income, education level, stress, current drinking, and smoking in both sexes. Men with other household members had a higher PUD risk compared to men or women living alone (reference), and the opposite was observed for women. Men with 4 household members had a higher PUD risk than men living alone in the model adjusted for age, BMI, income, location, education, and stress (OR = 2.04 [95% CI 1.28–3.27], p value = .003). Women with more than 6 household members had a lower PUD risk than women living alone in the adjusted model (OR = 0.50 [0.33–0.75], p value = .001). Women with more household members had a lower PUD risk. However, more men had PUD than women regardless of the number of household members.Mi Hong YimKeun Ho KimBum Ju LeeNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Mi Hong Yim Keun Ho Kim Bum Ju Lee The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
description	Abstract Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is caused by many sociodemographic and economic risk factors other than H. pylori infection. However, no studies reported an association between PUD and the number of household members. We showed the number of family members affected by PUD based on sex in a Korean population. This cross-sectional study used 1998–2009 data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple binary logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were constructed to analyze the association of PUD with the number of household members. The number of household members was associated with PUD, age, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, glucose, location (urban/rural), income, education level, stress, current drinking, and smoking in both sexes. Men with other household members had a higher PUD risk compared to men or women living alone (reference), and the opposite was observed for women. Men with 4 household members had a higher PUD risk than men living alone in the model adjusted for age, BMI, income, location, education, and stress (OR = 2.04 [95% CI 1.28–3.27], p value = .003). Women with more than 6 household members had a lower PUD risk than women living alone in the adjusted model (OR = 0.50 [0.33–0.75], p value = .001). Women with more household members had a lower PUD risk. However, more men had PUD than women regardless of the number of household members.
format	article
author	Mi Hong Yim Keun Ho Kim Bum Ju Lee
author_facet	Mi Hong Yim Keun Ho Kim Bum Ju Lee
author_sort	Mi Hong Yim
title	The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
title_short	The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
title_full	The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
title_fullStr	The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
title_full_unstemmed	The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
title_sort	number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9e043c8082424352953811f4c1b79263
work_keys_str_mv	AT mihongyim thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT keunhokim thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT bumjulee thenumberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT mihongyim numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT keunhokim numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease AT bumjulee numberofhouseholdmembersasariskfactorforpepticulcerdisease
_version_	1718392751402254336

The number of household members as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease

Ejemplares similares