Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice

Abstract Individuals often face choices that have uncertain outcomes and have important consequences. As a model of this environment, laboratory experiments often offer a choice between an uncertain, large reward that varies in its probability of delivery against a certain but smaller reward as a me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aaron P. Smith, Joshua S. Beckmann, Thomas R. Zentall
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9e10fa102d6444db80335fd2e5ab1251
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9e10fa102d6444db80335fd2e5ab1251
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9e10fa102d6444db80335fd2e5ab12512021-12-02T12:32:53ZGambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice10.1038/s41598-017-06641-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9e10fa102d6444db80335fd2e5ab12512017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06641-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Individuals often face choices that have uncertain outcomes and have important consequences. As a model of this environment, laboratory experiments often offer a choice between an uncertain, large reward that varies in its probability of delivery against a certain but smaller reward as a measure of an individual’s risk aversion. An important factor generally lacking from these procedures are gambling related cues that may moderate risk preferences. The present experiment offered pigeons choices between unreliable and certain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a ‘jackpot’ signal prior to reward delivery. The Unsignaled group received an ambiguous stimulus not informative of choice outcomes. For the Signaled group, presenting win signals effectively blocked value discounting for the large, uncertain outcome as the probability of a loss increased, whereas the Unsignaled group showed regular preference changes similar to previous research lacking gambling related cues. These maladaptive choices were further shown to be unaffected by more salient loss signals and resistant to response cost increases. The results suggest an important role of an individual’s sensitivity to outcome-correlated cues in influencing risky choices that may moderate gambling behaviors in humans, particularly in casino and other gambling-specific environments.Aaron P. SmithJoshua S. BeckmannThomas R. ZentallNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Aaron P. Smith
Joshua S. Beckmann
Thomas R. Zentall
Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
description Abstract Individuals often face choices that have uncertain outcomes and have important consequences. As a model of this environment, laboratory experiments often offer a choice between an uncertain, large reward that varies in its probability of delivery against a certain but smaller reward as a measure of an individual’s risk aversion. An important factor generally lacking from these procedures are gambling related cues that may moderate risk preferences. The present experiment offered pigeons choices between unreliable and certain rewards but, for the Signaled group on winning choices, presented a ‘jackpot’ signal prior to reward delivery. The Unsignaled group received an ambiguous stimulus not informative of choice outcomes. For the Signaled group, presenting win signals effectively blocked value discounting for the large, uncertain outcome as the probability of a loss increased, whereas the Unsignaled group showed regular preference changes similar to previous research lacking gambling related cues. These maladaptive choices were further shown to be unaffected by more salient loss signals and resistant to response cost increases. The results suggest an important role of an individual’s sensitivity to outcome-correlated cues in influencing risky choices that may moderate gambling behaviors in humans, particularly in casino and other gambling-specific environments.
format article
author Aaron P. Smith
Joshua S. Beckmann
Thomas R. Zentall
author_facet Aaron P. Smith
Joshua S. Beckmann
Thomas R. Zentall
author_sort Aaron P. Smith
title Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
title_short Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
title_full Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
title_fullStr Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
title_full_unstemmed Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
title_sort gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/9e10fa102d6444db80335fd2e5ab1251
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronpsmith gamblinglikebehaviorinpigeonsjackpotsignalspromotemaladaptiveriskychoice
AT joshuasbeckmann gamblinglikebehaviorinpigeonsjackpotsignalspromotemaladaptiveriskychoice
AT thomasrzentall gamblinglikebehaviorinpigeonsjackpotsignalspromotemaladaptiveriskychoice
_version_ 1718393935957590016