Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.

Polymeric arrays of microrelief structures have a range of potential applications. For example, to influence wettability, to act as biologically inspired adhesives, to resist biofouling, and to play a role in the "feel" of an object during tactile interaction. Here, we investigate the dama...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickey Finn, Jeremy Treiber, Mahmoud Issa, Christian J Martens, Colin P Feeney, Lehna Ngwa, Charles Dhong, Darren J Lipomi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9e692beb67df41d0aa0177a9beefb3b3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9e692beb67df41d0aa0177a9beefb3b3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9e692beb67df41d0aa0177a9beefb3b32021-12-02T20:04:45ZSurvival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0255980https://doaj.org/article/9e692beb67df41d0aa0177a9beefb3b32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255980https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Polymeric arrays of microrelief structures have a range of potential applications. For example, to influence wettability, to act as biologically inspired adhesives, to resist biofouling, and to play a role in the "feel" of an object during tactile interaction. Here, we investigate the damage to micropillar arrays comprising pillars of different modulus, spacing, diameter, and aspect ratio due to the sliding of a silicone cast of a human finger. The goal is to determine the effect of these parameters on the types of damage observed, including adhesive failure and ploughing of material from the finger onto the array. Our experiments point to four principal conclusions [1]. Aspect ratio is the dominant parameter in determining survivability through its effect on the bending stiffness of micropillars [2]. All else equal, micropillars with larger diameter are less susceptible to breakage and collapse [3]. The spacing of pillars in the array largely determines which type of adhesive failure occurs in non-surviving arrays [4]. Elastic modulus plays an important role in survivability. Clear evidence of elastic recovery was seen in the more flexible polymer and this recovery led to more instances of pristine survivability where the stiffer polymer tended to ablate PDMS. We developed a simple model to describe the observed bending of micropillars, based on the quasi-static mechanics of beam-columns, that indicated they experience forces ranging from 10-4-10-7 N to deflect into adhesive contact. Taken together, results obtained using our framework should inform design considerations for microstructures intended to be handled by human users.Mickey FinnJeremy TreiberMahmoud IssaChristian J MartensColin P FeeneyLehna NgwaCharles DhongDarren J LipomiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0255980 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mickey Finn
Jeremy Treiber
Mahmoud Issa
Christian J Martens
Colin P Feeney
Lehna Ngwa
Charles Dhong
Darren J Lipomi
Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
description Polymeric arrays of microrelief structures have a range of potential applications. For example, to influence wettability, to act as biologically inspired adhesives, to resist biofouling, and to play a role in the "feel" of an object during tactile interaction. Here, we investigate the damage to micropillar arrays comprising pillars of different modulus, spacing, diameter, and aspect ratio due to the sliding of a silicone cast of a human finger. The goal is to determine the effect of these parameters on the types of damage observed, including adhesive failure and ploughing of material from the finger onto the array. Our experiments point to four principal conclusions [1]. Aspect ratio is the dominant parameter in determining survivability through its effect on the bending stiffness of micropillars [2]. All else equal, micropillars with larger diameter are less susceptible to breakage and collapse [3]. The spacing of pillars in the array largely determines which type of adhesive failure occurs in non-surviving arrays [4]. Elastic modulus plays an important role in survivability. Clear evidence of elastic recovery was seen in the more flexible polymer and this recovery led to more instances of pristine survivability where the stiffer polymer tended to ablate PDMS. We developed a simple model to describe the observed bending of micropillars, based on the quasi-static mechanics of beam-columns, that indicated they experience forces ranging from 10-4-10-7 N to deflect into adhesive contact. Taken together, results obtained using our framework should inform design considerations for microstructures intended to be handled by human users.
format article
author Mickey Finn
Jeremy Treiber
Mahmoud Issa
Christian J Martens
Colin P Feeney
Lehna Ngwa
Charles Dhong
Darren J Lipomi
author_facet Mickey Finn
Jeremy Treiber
Mahmoud Issa
Christian J Martens
Colin P Feeney
Lehna Ngwa
Charles Dhong
Darren J Lipomi
author_sort Mickey Finn
title Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
title_short Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
title_full Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
title_fullStr Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
title_full_unstemmed Survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
title_sort survival of polymeric microstructures subjected to interrogatory touch.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9e692beb67df41d0aa0177a9beefb3b3
work_keys_str_mv AT mickeyfinn survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT jeremytreiber survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT mahmoudissa survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT christianjmartens survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT colinpfeeney survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT lehnangwa survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT charlesdhong survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
AT darrenjlipomi survivalofpolymericmicrostructuressubjectedtointerrogatorytouch
_version_ 1718375558912409600