Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education

Sustainable procurement is developing among practitioners and academics, but not many have done this research with the object of higher education institutions. This study succeeded in obtaining twelve indicators of sustainable procurement in higher education in Indonesia. The interpretive structural...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rangga Primadasa, Dina Tauhida
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Industrial Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Technology Universitas Ahmad Dahlan 2021
Materias:	sustainable procurement interpretative structural modeling micmac analysis higher education Industrial engineering. Management engineering T55.4-60.8 Industry HD2321-4730.9
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/9e88860ec6dc4151a41399725ff1d2c3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:9e88860ec6dc4151a41399725ff1d2c3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:9e88860ec6dc4151a41399725ff1d2c32021-11-24T12:45:26ZInterrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education10.12928/si.v19i2.214641693-65902442-2630https://doaj.org/article/9e88860ec6dc4151a41399725ff1d2c32021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/Spektrum/article/view/21464https://doaj.org/toc/1693-6590https://doaj.org/toc/2442-2630Sustainable procurement is developing among practitioners and academics, but not many have done this research with the object of higher education institutions. This study succeeded in obtaining twelve indicators of sustainable procurement in higher education in Indonesia. The interpretive structural modeling method is used to model these indicators so that a four-level model is obtained, where the first level consists of seven indicators, the second level is one indicator, the third level is two indicators, and the fourth level is two indicators. In addition, the twelve indicators were also grouped using MICMAC analysis into four quadrants. Eight indicators are included in the autonomous indicators quadrant, four indicators are included in the independent indicators quadrant. Nothing is included in the dependent indicators and linkage indicators quadrant. This study proposes to the management of higher education to improve the performance of sustainable procurement, starting from level four indicators, namely the existence of routine monitoring and sustainability criteria (P12) and there is awareness of sustainable procurement on campus internals (P2).Rangga PrimadasaDina TauhidaIndustrial Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Technology Universitas Ahmad Dahlanarticlesustainable procurementinterpretative structural modelingmicmac analysishigher educationIndustrial engineering. Management engineeringT55.4-60.8IndustryHD2321-4730.9ENIDSpektrum Industri: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengetahuan dan Penerapan Teknik Industri, Vol 19, Iss 2, Pp 157-167 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	sustainable procurement interpretative structural modeling micmac analysis higher education Industrial engineering. Management engineering T55.4-60.8 Industry HD2321-4730.9
spellingShingle	sustainable procurement interpretative structural modeling micmac analysis higher education Industrial engineering. Management engineering T55.4-60.8 Industry HD2321-4730.9 Rangga Primadasa Dina Tauhida Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
description	Sustainable procurement is developing among practitioners and academics, but not many have done this research with the object of higher education institutions. This study succeeded in obtaining twelve indicators of sustainable procurement in higher education in Indonesia. The interpretive structural modeling method is used to model these indicators so that a four-level model is obtained, where the first level consists of seven indicators, the second level is one indicator, the third level is two indicators, and the fourth level is two indicators. In addition, the twelve indicators were also grouped using MICMAC analysis into four quadrants. Eight indicators are included in the autonomous indicators quadrant, four indicators are included in the independent indicators quadrant. Nothing is included in the dependent indicators and linkage indicators quadrant. This study proposes to the management of higher education to improve the performance of sustainable procurement, starting from level four indicators, namely the existence of routine monitoring and sustainability criteria (P12) and there is awareness of sustainable procurement on campus internals (P2).
format	article
author	Rangga Primadasa Dina Tauhida
author_facet	Rangga Primadasa Dina Tauhida
author_sort	Rangga Primadasa
title	Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
title_short	Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
title_full	Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
title_fullStr	Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
title_full_unstemmed	Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education
title_sort	interrelationship performance indicators model of sustainable procurement in higher education
publisher	Industrial Engineering Department Faculty of Industrial Technology Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/9e88860ec6dc4151a41399725ff1d2c3
work_keys_str_mv	AT ranggaprimadasa interrelationshipperformanceindicatorsmodelofsustainableprocurementinhighereducation AT dinatauhida interrelationshipperformanceindicatorsmodelofsustainableprocurementinhighereducation
_version_	1718415063326392320

Interrelationship Performance Indicators Model of Sustainable Procurement in Higher Education

Ejemplares similares