MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were system...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db54722021-12-02T02:34:55ZMGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis1759-77141759-770610.1111/1759-7714.14186https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db54722021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14186https://doaj.org/toc/1759-7706https://doaj.org/toc/1759-7714Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were systematic electronic searched in the databases of Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI. Data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn), and true negative (tn) were extracted from the included studies and made combination. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis were pooled. Results Twelve studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31–0.49) 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77–0.97), and 4.20 (95% CI = 2.09–8.44), respectively under random effect model. The SROC of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.53–0.62). Conclusion MGMT methylation rate was higher in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) of lung cancer cases compared to controls. High diagnostic specificity indicated that MGMT methylation in plasma and BLAF can be applied as lung cancer confirmation test.Bizheng ChenXiaozhen YingLiming BaoWileyarticlebiomarkerlung cancer diagnosismeta‐analysisMGMT genepromoter methylationNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENThoracic Cancer, Vol 12, Iss 23, Pp 3194-3200 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
biomarker lung cancer diagnosis meta‐analysis MGMT gene promoter methylation Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 |
spellingShingle |
biomarker lung cancer diagnosis meta‐analysis MGMT gene promoter methylation Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens RC254-282 Bizheng Chen Xiaozhen Ying Liming Bao MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
description |
Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were systematic electronic searched in the databases of Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI. Data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn), and true negative (tn) were extracted from the included studies and made combination. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis were pooled. Results Twelve studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31–0.49) 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77–0.97), and 4.20 (95% CI = 2.09–8.44), respectively under random effect model. The SROC of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.53–0.62). Conclusion MGMT methylation rate was higher in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) of lung cancer cases compared to controls. High diagnostic specificity indicated that MGMT methylation in plasma and BLAF can be applied as lung cancer confirmation test. |
format |
article |
author |
Bizheng Chen Xiaozhen Ying Liming Bao |
author_facet |
Bizheng Chen Xiaozhen Ying Liming Bao |
author_sort |
Bizheng Chen |
title |
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
title_short |
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
title_full |
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr |
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis |
title_sort |
mgmt gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: an update meta‐analysis |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bizhengchen mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis AT xiaozhenying mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis AT limingbao mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718402365988536320 |