MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis

Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were system...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bizheng Chen, Xiaozhen Ying, Liming Bao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db54722021-12-02T02:34:55ZMGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis1759-77141759-770610.1111/1759-7714.14186https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db54722021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14186https://doaj.org/toc/1759-7706https://doaj.org/toc/1759-7714Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were systematic electronic searched in the databases of Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI. Data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn), and true negative (tn) were extracted from the included studies and made combination. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis were pooled. Results Twelve studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31–0.49) 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77–0.97), and 4.20 (95% CI = 2.09–8.44), respectively under random effect model. The SROC of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.53–0.62). Conclusion MGMT methylation rate was higher in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) of lung cancer cases compared to controls. High diagnostic specificity indicated that MGMT methylation in plasma and BLAF can be applied as lung cancer confirmation test.Bizheng ChenXiaozhen YingLiming BaoWileyarticlebiomarkerlung cancer diagnosismeta‐analysisMGMT genepromoter methylationNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENThoracic Cancer, Vol 12, Iss 23, Pp 3194-3200 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic biomarker
lung cancer diagnosis
meta‐analysis
MGMT gene
promoter methylation
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle biomarker
lung cancer diagnosis
meta‐analysis
MGMT gene
promoter methylation
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Bizheng Chen
Xiaozhen Ying
Liming Bao
MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
description Abstract Objective To investigate O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis by pooling relevant open published data. Methods Clinical studies relevant to MGMT gene promoter methylation and lung cancer were systematic electronic searched in the databases of Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and CNKI. Data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn), and true negative (tn) were extracted from the included studies and made combination. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis were pooled. Results Twelve studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31–0.49) 0.92 (95% CI = 0.77–0.97), and 4.20 (95% CI = 2.09–8.44), respectively under random effect model. The SROC of MGMT gene methylation for lung cancer diagnosis was 0.58 (95% CI = 0.53–0.62). Conclusion MGMT methylation rate was higher in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF) of lung cancer cases compared to controls. High diagnostic specificity indicated that MGMT methylation in plasma and BLAF can be applied as lung cancer confirmation test.
format article
author Bizheng Chen
Xiaozhen Ying
Liming Bao
author_facet Bizheng Chen
Xiaozhen Ying
Liming Bao
author_sort Bizheng Chen
title MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
title_short MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
title_full MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
title_fullStr MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed MGMT gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: An update meta‐analysis
title_sort mgmt gene promoter methylation in humoral tissue as biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis: an update meta‐analysis
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9eae6dbdf0534983bab8a15a58db5472
work_keys_str_mv AT bizhengchen mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis
AT xiaozhenying mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis
AT limingbao mgmtgenepromotermethylationinhumoraltissueasbiomarkerforlungcancerdiagnosisanupdatemetaanalysis
_version_ 1718402365988536320