Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice

Abstract The energy balance and life cycle assessment (LCA) of ohmic heating and appertization systems for processing of chopped tomatoes with juice (CTwJ) were evaluated. The data included in the study, such as processing conditions, energy consumption, and water use, were experimentally collected....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sami Ghnimi, Amin Nikkhah, Jo Dewulf, Sam Van Haute
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9eb15a0da6644e14847b511a9772bced
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9eb15a0da6644e14847b511a9772bced
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9eb15a0da6644e14847b511a9772bced2021-12-02T16:06:08ZLife cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice10.1038/s41598-021-92211-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9eb15a0da6644e14847b511a9772bced2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92211-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The energy balance and life cycle assessment (LCA) of ohmic heating and appertization systems for processing of chopped tomatoes with juice (CTwJ) were evaluated. The data included in the study, such as processing conditions, energy consumption, and water use, were experimentally collected. The functional unit was considered to be 1 kg of packaged CTwJ. Six LCA impact assessment methodologies were evaluated for uncertainty analysis of selection of the impact assessment methodology. The energy requirement evaluation showed the highest energy consumption for appertization (156 kWh/t of product). The energy saving of the ohmic heating line compared to the appertization line is 102 kWh/t of the product (or 65% energy saving). The energy efficiencies of the appertization and ohmic heating lines are 25% and 77%, respectively. Regarding the environmental impact, CTwJ processing and packaging by appertization were higher than those of ohmic heating systems. In other words, CTwJ production by the ohmic heating system was more environmentally efficient. The tin production phase was the environmental hotspot in packaged CTwJ production by the appertization system; however, the agricultural phase of production was the hotspot in ohmic heating processing. The uncertainty analysis results indicated that the global warming potential for appertization of 1 kg of packaged CTwJ ranges from 4.13 to 4.44 kg CO2eq. In addition, the global warming potential of the ohmic heating system ranges from 2.50 to 2.54 kg CO2eq. This study highlights that ohmic heating presents a great alternative to conventional sterilization methods due to its low environmental impact and high energy efficiency.Sami GhnimiAmin NikkhahJo DewulfSam Van HauteNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sami Ghnimi
Amin Nikkhah
Jo Dewulf
Sam Van Haute
Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
description Abstract The energy balance and life cycle assessment (LCA) of ohmic heating and appertization systems for processing of chopped tomatoes with juice (CTwJ) were evaluated. The data included in the study, such as processing conditions, energy consumption, and water use, were experimentally collected. The functional unit was considered to be 1 kg of packaged CTwJ. Six LCA impact assessment methodologies were evaluated for uncertainty analysis of selection of the impact assessment methodology. The energy requirement evaluation showed the highest energy consumption for appertization (156 kWh/t of product). The energy saving of the ohmic heating line compared to the appertization line is 102 kWh/t of the product (or 65% energy saving). The energy efficiencies of the appertization and ohmic heating lines are 25% and 77%, respectively. Regarding the environmental impact, CTwJ processing and packaging by appertization were higher than those of ohmic heating systems. In other words, CTwJ production by the ohmic heating system was more environmentally efficient. The tin production phase was the environmental hotspot in packaged CTwJ production by the appertization system; however, the agricultural phase of production was the hotspot in ohmic heating processing. The uncertainty analysis results indicated that the global warming potential for appertization of 1 kg of packaged CTwJ ranges from 4.13 to 4.44 kg CO2eq. In addition, the global warming potential of the ohmic heating system ranges from 2.50 to 2.54 kg CO2eq. This study highlights that ohmic heating presents a great alternative to conventional sterilization methods due to its low environmental impact and high energy efficiency.
format article
author Sami Ghnimi
Amin Nikkhah
Jo Dewulf
Sam Van Haute
author_facet Sami Ghnimi
Amin Nikkhah
Jo Dewulf
Sam Van Haute
author_sort Sami Ghnimi
title Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
title_short Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
title_full Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
title_sort life cycle assessment and energy comparison of aseptic ohmic heating and appertization of chopped tomatoes with juice
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/9eb15a0da6644e14847b511a9772bced
work_keys_str_mv AT samighnimi lifecycleassessmentandenergycomparisonofasepticohmicheatingandappertizationofchoppedtomatoeswithjuice
AT aminnikkhah lifecycleassessmentandenergycomparisonofasepticohmicheatingandappertizationofchoppedtomatoeswithjuice
AT jodewulf lifecycleassessmentandenergycomparisonofasepticohmicheatingandappertizationofchoppedtomatoeswithjuice
AT samvanhaute lifecycleassessmentandenergycomparisonofasepticohmicheatingandappertizationofchoppedtomatoeswithjuice
_version_ 1718385106676088832