Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patient...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe2021-12-02T16:06:03ZAnalysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice10.1038/s41598-017-07785-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07785-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patients with suspected ATB were enrolled prospectively. Influencing factors of the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB were evaluated using logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated with consideration of relevant factors. Of the 865 participants, 205 (23.7%) had ATB, including 58 (28.3%) microbiologically confirmed TB and 147 (71.7%) clinically diagnosed TB. 615 (71.7%) were non-TB. 45 (5.2%) cases were clinically indeterminate and excluded from the final analysis. In multivariate analysis, serous effusion was the only independent risk factor related to lower sensitivity (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.81) among patients with ATB. Among non-TB patients, age, TB history, immunosuppressive agents/glucocorticoid treatment and lymphocyte count were the independent risk factors related to specificity of T-SPOT.TB. Sensitivity, specificity, PV+, PV−, LR+ and LR− of T-SPOT.TB for diagnosis of ATB were 78.5%, 74.1%, 50.3%, 91.2%, 3.0 and 0.3, respectively. This study suggests that influencing factors of sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB should be considered for interpretation of T-SPOT.TB results.Lifan ZhangXiaochun ShiYueqiu ZhangYao ZhangFeifei HuoBaotong ZhouGuohua DengXiaoqing LiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Lifan Zhang Xiaochun Shi Yueqiu Zhang Yao Zhang Feifei Huo Baotong Zhou Guohua Deng Xiaoqing Liu Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
description |
Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patients with suspected ATB were enrolled prospectively. Influencing factors of the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB were evaluated using logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated with consideration of relevant factors. Of the 865 participants, 205 (23.7%) had ATB, including 58 (28.3%) microbiologically confirmed TB and 147 (71.7%) clinically diagnosed TB. 615 (71.7%) were non-TB. 45 (5.2%) cases were clinically indeterminate and excluded from the final analysis. In multivariate analysis, serous effusion was the only independent risk factor related to lower sensitivity (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.81) among patients with ATB. Among non-TB patients, age, TB history, immunosuppressive agents/glucocorticoid treatment and lymphocyte count were the independent risk factors related to specificity of T-SPOT.TB. Sensitivity, specificity, PV+, PV−, LR+ and LR− of T-SPOT.TB for diagnosis of ATB were 78.5%, 74.1%, 50.3%, 91.2%, 3.0 and 0.3, respectively. This study suggests that influencing factors of sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB should be considered for interpretation of T-SPOT.TB results. |
format |
article |
author |
Lifan Zhang Xiaochun Shi Yueqiu Zhang Yao Zhang Feifei Huo Baotong Zhou Guohua Deng Xiaoqing Liu |
author_facet |
Lifan Zhang Xiaochun Shi Yueqiu Zhang Yao Zhang Feifei Huo Baotong Zhou Guohua Deng Xiaoqing Liu |
author_sort |
Lifan Zhang |
title |
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
title_short |
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
title_full |
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice |
title_sort |
analysis of factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of t-spot.tb for active tuberculosis in clinical practice |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lifanzhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT xiaochunshi analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT yueqiuzhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT yaozhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT feifeihuo analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT baotongzhou analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT guohuadeng analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice AT xiaoqingliu analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice |
_version_ |
1718385164634030080 |