Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice

Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patient...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lifan Zhang, Xiaochun Shi, Yueqiu Zhang, Yao Zhang, Feifei Huo, Baotong Zhou, Guohua Deng, Xiaoqing Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe2021-12-02T16:06:03ZAnalysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice10.1038/s41598-017-07785-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07785-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patients with suspected ATB were enrolled prospectively. Influencing factors of the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB were evaluated using logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated with consideration of relevant factors. Of the 865 participants, 205 (23.7%) had ATB, including 58 (28.3%) microbiologically confirmed TB and 147 (71.7%) clinically diagnosed TB. 615 (71.7%) were non-TB. 45 (5.2%) cases were clinically indeterminate and excluded from the final analysis. In multivariate analysis, serous effusion was the only independent risk factor related to lower sensitivity (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.81) among patients with ATB. Among non-TB patients, age, TB history, immunosuppressive agents/glucocorticoid treatment and lymphocyte count were the independent risk factors related to specificity of T-SPOT.TB. Sensitivity, specificity, PV+, PV−, LR+ and LR− of T-SPOT.TB for diagnosis of ATB were 78.5%, 74.1%, 50.3%, 91.2%, 3.0 and 0.3, respectively. This study suggests that influencing factors of sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB should be considered for interpretation of T-SPOT.TB results.Lifan ZhangXiaochun ShiYueqiu ZhangYao ZhangFeifei HuoBaotong ZhouGuohua DengXiaoqing LiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Lifan Zhang
Xiaochun Shi
Yueqiu Zhang
Yao Zhang
Feifei Huo
Baotong Zhou
Guohua Deng
Xiaoqing Liu
Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
description Abstract T-SPOT.TB didn’t perform a perfect diagnosis for active tuberculosis (ATB), and some factors may influence the results. We did this study to evaluate possible factors associated with the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB, and the diagnostic parameters under varied conditions. Patients with suspected ATB were enrolled prospectively. Influencing factors of the sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB were evaluated using logistic regression models. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values (PV), and likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated with consideration of relevant factors. Of the 865 participants, 205 (23.7%) had ATB, including 58 (28.3%) microbiologically confirmed TB and 147 (71.7%) clinically diagnosed TB. 615 (71.7%) were non-TB. 45 (5.2%) cases were clinically indeterminate and excluded from the final analysis. In multivariate analysis, serous effusion was the only independent risk factor related to lower sensitivity (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18–0.81) among patients with ATB. Among non-TB patients, age, TB history, immunosuppressive agents/glucocorticoid treatment and lymphocyte count were the independent risk factors related to specificity of T-SPOT.TB. Sensitivity, specificity, PV+, PV−, LR+ and LR− of T-SPOT.TB for diagnosis of ATB were 78.5%, 74.1%, 50.3%, 91.2%, 3.0 and 0.3, respectively. This study suggests that influencing factors of sensitivity and specificity of T-SPOT.TB should be considered for interpretation of T-SPOT.TB results.
format article
author Lifan Zhang
Xiaochun Shi
Yueqiu Zhang
Yao Zhang
Feifei Huo
Baotong Zhou
Guohua Deng
Xiaoqing Liu
author_facet Lifan Zhang
Xiaochun Shi
Yueqiu Zhang
Yao Zhang
Feifei Huo
Baotong Zhou
Guohua Deng
Xiaoqing Liu
author_sort Lifan Zhang
title Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
title_short Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
title_full Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Factors Influencing Diagnostic Accuracy of T-SPOT.TB for Active Tuberculosis in Clinical Practice
title_sort analysis of factors influencing diagnostic accuracy of t-spot.tb for active tuberculosis in clinical practice
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/9eb25157812a42deb0334d7576db87fe
work_keys_str_mv AT lifanzhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT xiaochunshi analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT yueqiuzhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT yaozhang analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT feifeihuo analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT baotongzhou analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT guohuadeng analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
AT xiaoqingliu analysisoffactorsinfluencingdiagnosticaccuracyoftspottbforactivetuberculosisinclinicalpractice
_version_ 1718385164634030080