Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management.
Standardized instruments are often used to monitor one's progress in tinnitus relief although they were developed to screen and diagnose tinnitus. The need for the development for a tinnitus outcome assessment tool is high in the field of audiology and otolaryngology. The purpose of this study...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9edc37bd0ee94448b07976e514819cfa |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:9edc37bd0ee94448b07976e514819cfa |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:9edc37bd0ee94448b07976e514819cfa2021-11-25T06:19:18ZContent validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251244https://doaj.org/article/9edc37bd0ee94448b07976e514819cfa2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251244https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Standardized instruments are often used to monitor one's progress in tinnitus relief although they were developed to screen and diagnose tinnitus. The need for the development for a tinnitus outcome assessment tool is high in the field of audiology and otolaryngology. The purpose of this study was to develop a tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management (listening to sound stimuli for tinnitus relief) and assess its content validity. A total of 32 questions with six domains (Tinnitus characteristics, the impact of tinnitus, tinnitus and hearing issues, handedness, tinnitus management, and sound management outcome) were generated after closely investigating major tinnitus questionnaires used worldwide (i.e. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire) as well as literature. Ten healthcare professionals evaluated the appropriateness of the questionnaire items on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 is strongly inappropriate and 5 is strongly appropriate. Content relevance was assessed by computing the content validity index with the cut-off value of 0.75. Each response was first weighted as follows: 1 = 0; 2 = 0.25; 3 = 0.5; 4 = 0.75; and 5 = 1.0. The weighted average was then calculated. Items with a content validity index less than 0.75 were discarded and some items were revised according to the experts' feedback. As a result, 31 out of the 32 items had the content validity index higher than 0.75, indicating that the items are appropriate to obtain information about the six domains. Reflecting the experts' feedback, some questions were revised to be more specific. The study provides a baseline structure regarding potential questions to be included in a tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. Development and standardization of such questionnaire would be a pathway to validating tinnitus relief via sound therapy.Hye Yoon SeolGa-Young KimMini JoSoojin KangYoung Sang ChoSung Hwa HongIl Joon MoonPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0251244 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Hye Yoon Seol Ga-Young Kim Mini Jo Soojin Kang Young Sang Cho Sung Hwa Hong Il Joon Moon Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
description |
Standardized instruments are often used to monitor one's progress in tinnitus relief although they were developed to screen and diagnose tinnitus. The need for the development for a tinnitus outcome assessment tool is high in the field of audiology and otolaryngology. The purpose of this study was to develop a tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management (listening to sound stimuli for tinnitus relief) and assess its content validity. A total of 32 questions with six domains (Tinnitus characteristics, the impact of tinnitus, tinnitus and hearing issues, handedness, tinnitus management, and sound management outcome) were generated after closely investigating major tinnitus questionnaires used worldwide (i.e. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire) as well as literature. Ten healthcare professionals evaluated the appropriateness of the questionnaire items on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 is strongly inappropriate and 5 is strongly appropriate. Content relevance was assessed by computing the content validity index with the cut-off value of 0.75. Each response was first weighted as follows: 1 = 0; 2 = 0.25; 3 = 0.5; 4 = 0.75; and 5 = 1.0. The weighted average was then calculated. Items with a content validity index less than 0.75 were discarded and some items were revised according to the experts' feedback. As a result, 31 out of the 32 items had the content validity index higher than 0.75, indicating that the items are appropriate to obtain information about the six domains. Reflecting the experts' feedback, some questions were revised to be more specific. The study provides a baseline structure regarding potential questions to be included in a tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. Development and standardization of such questionnaire would be a pathway to validating tinnitus relief via sound therapy. |
format |
article |
author |
Hye Yoon Seol Ga-Young Kim Mini Jo Soojin Kang Young Sang Cho Sung Hwa Hong Il Joon Moon |
author_facet |
Hye Yoon Seol Ga-Young Kim Mini Jo Soojin Kang Young Sang Cho Sung Hwa Hong Il Joon Moon |
author_sort |
Hye Yoon Seol |
title |
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
title_short |
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
title_full |
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
title_fullStr |
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
title_sort |
content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/9edc37bd0ee94448b07976e514819cfa |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hyeyoonseol contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT gayoungkim contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT minijo contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT soojinkang contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT youngsangcho contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT sunghwahong contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement AT iljoonmoon contentvalidityofthetinnitusoutcomequestionnaireforsoundmanagement |
_version_ |
1718413881750061056 |