A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy
Abstract The feasible of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) remains controversial when compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to summarise the available evidence to compare MIPD vs OPD. We systemically searched PubMed, EMBASE...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Zhanwei Zhao, Zifang Yin, Zhenning Hang, Gang Ji, Quanxin Feng, Qingchuan Zhao |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/9ef86debbae24a34821e28ec89e6fcd2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical Outcomes and Complications With Open vs Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair
por: Kristin C. Caolo BA, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides better histopathological outcomes as compared to its open counterpart: a meta-analysis
por: Xiang Da Dong, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Minimally invasive (MIE) vs open surgery for cancer of esophagus and GE junction. Long term results
por: Binay Thakur, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Impact of Preoperative and Postoperative Malnutrition on Outcomes for Ampullary Carcinoma After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
por: Jikuan Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Complete laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: our experience of the first case
por: Mukund Raj Joshi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)