Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty

Aris N Kollias, Markus M Schaumberger, Thomas C Kreutzer, Michael W Ulbig, Carlo A LackerbauerUniversity Eye Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, GermanyPurpose: The point of interest of this retrospective case review is to study refractive changes caused by the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aris N Kollias, Markus M Schaumberger, Thomas C Kreutzer, et al
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/9f28967b276f47209285ef80e1e9f533
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:9f28967b276f47209285ef80e1e9f533
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:9f28967b276f47209285ef80e1e9f5332021-12-02T03:43:29ZTwo-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/9f28967b276f47209285ef80e1e9f5332009-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/two-step-lasik-after-penetrating-keratoplasty-a3647https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Aris N Kollias, Markus M Schaumberger, Thomas C Kreutzer, Michael W Ulbig, Carlo A LackerbauerUniversity Eye Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, GermanyPurpose: The point of interest of this retrospective case review is to study refractive changes caused by the hinged lamellar keratotomy and the refractive outcome after laser ablation in a second step within the scope of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with penetrating keratoplasty.Methods: Data from eight patients obtained before lamellar keratotomy, before laser ablation, and three months later were evaluated. Keratotomies were performed with the Moria® LSK one and the Amadeus® 2 microkeratome, laser ablation was performed with the Schwind® Keratome I and the Wavelight® Allegretto WaveEyeQ. Results: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) improved significantly from 1 [logMar] to 0.4 [logMar] at the last visit. Median gain of UCVA was 7.38 ± 2.96 Snellen lines. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not change significantly. Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent decreased from -4.02 ± 4.77 diopters (D) to -1.11 ± 2.45 D after laser ablation. Mean preoperative manifest astigmatism was -7.27 ± 3.65 D, after lamellar keratotomy -6.72 ± 3.68 D, and after laser ablation -2.08 ± 1.80 D. Manifest astigmatism did not change significantly after the keratotomy.Conclusions: Lamellar keratotomy causes biomechanical changes to the cornea. We favor a two-step LASIK in penetrating keratoplasty patients in order to improve precision and predictability of the refractive outcome.Keywords: two-step, cornea, LASIK, keratoplasty, astigmatism Aris N KolliasMarkus M SchaumbergerThomas C Kreutzer, et alDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2009, Iss default, Pp 581-586 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Aris N Kollias
Markus M Schaumberger
Thomas C Kreutzer, et al
Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
description Aris N Kollias, Markus M Schaumberger, Thomas C Kreutzer, Michael W Ulbig, Carlo A LackerbauerUniversity Eye Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, GermanyPurpose: The point of interest of this retrospective case review is to study refractive changes caused by the hinged lamellar keratotomy and the refractive outcome after laser ablation in a second step within the scope of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with penetrating keratoplasty.Methods: Data from eight patients obtained before lamellar keratotomy, before laser ablation, and three months later were evaluated. Keratotomies were performed with the Moria® LSK one and the Amadeus® 2 microkeratome, laser ablation was performed with the Schwind® Keratome I and the Wavelight® Allegretto WaveEyeQ. Results: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) improved significantly from 1 [logMar] to 0.4 [logMar] at the last visit. Median gain of UCVA was 7.38 ± 2.96 Snellen lines. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not change significantly. Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent decreased from -4.02 ± 4.77 diopters (D) to -1.11 ± 2.45 D after laser ablation. Mean preoperative manifest astigmatism was -7.27 ± 3.65 D, after lamellar keratotomy -6.72 ± 3.68 D, and after laser ablation -2.08 ± 1.80 D. Manifest astigmatism did not change significantly after the keratotomy.Conclusions: Lamellar keratotomy causes biomechanical changes to the cornea. We favor a two-step LASIK in penetrating keratoplasty patients in order to improve precision and predictability of the refractive outcome.Keywords: two-step, cornea, LASIK, keratoplasty, astigmatism
format article
author Aris N Kollias
Markus M Schaumberger
Thomas C Kreutzer, et al
author_facet Aris N Kollias
Markus M Schaumberger
Thomas C Kreutzer, et al
author_sort Aris N Kollias
title Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
title_short Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
title_full Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
title_fullStr Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Two-step LASIK after penetrating keratoplasty
title_sort two-step lasik after penetrating keratoplasty
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/9f28967b276f47209285ef80e1e9f533
work_keys_str_mv AT arisampnbspnkollias twosteplasikafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT markusmschaumberger twosteplasikafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT thomasckreutzerampnbspetal twosteplasikafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
_version_ 1718401685954494464